California Feeds Us, But It’s in Severe Drought Again. Time for a New Idea.

We can rely less on the Golden State and still have plentiful food.

Groves of citrus trees sit below a barren hillside in Tulare County, outside of Porterville, Calif, in 2015. Gregory Bull/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Chances are, you’ll eat something grown in California today. Its farms churn out a third of US-grown vegetables and two-thirds of its fruits and nuts, and more milk than any other state. But as I’ve documented in many articles and in my 2020 book Perilous Bountyreleased in paperback today, May 2—its water resources are dwindling, parched by climate change and a relentless expansion of thirsty nut groves.

Hot on the heels of the epochal 2011-2016 drought, the state has again descended into an even more extreme dry spell. This year marked the single “driest and among the warmest January to mid-April periods on record,” according to the eminent University of California, Los Angeles climatologist Daniel Swain. Alarming news, because that’s the very time frame when the state typically receives the bulk of its precipitation. 

Where will we get our fruits and vegetables as California’s farms inevitably adapt to a hotter, drier new normal? The current drought isn’t likely to cause an imminent vegetable shortage—the state’s growers will scrape by siphoning water from ever-sinking aquifers. But they’re consuming what’s essentially a fossil resource, and at some point soon they’ll have to scale back.  In my book, I showed that despite the explosion in farmers markets and interest in “eating local” over the past 30 years, we still lean heavily on California for fresh food. I called for a national push to reduce our reliance on food grown in the Golden State by ramping up production in every other region of the country.

I discussed these ideas on the food-and-climate podcast Hot Farm, produced by the Food & Environment Reporting Network and hosted by Eve Abrams. The final episode took a close at a transformation in the Mississippi Delta. This region is traditionally dominated by crops like corn and soybeans, destined for livestock feed and biofuel plants, not your grocery cart.

Reporter Travis Lux teases out the story of Shawn Peebles, an eastern Arkansas farmer who saved his family land from bankruptcy by switching from those low-value commodities in 2009 and diving into organically grown sweet potatoes, edamame (fresh edible soybeans), melons, green beans, black-eyed peas, and more. He did it by scrapping, saving, and making relationships with big buyers like Costco who ensure him a steady market. 

While Peebles serves as a hopeful success story, Lux makes clear that he’s a “trailblazer forging a new path,” and still just “one guy with one farm” in a region whose land remains dominated by non-food commodity crops. California still stocks the supermarket produce aisle in the Delta, just as it does everywhere else. Creating more Shawn Peebles—not just in his home region, but also other parts in the country that have been outsourcing their fresh produce production to California for decades—will require action from federal and regional policymakers: investments in long-vanished infrastructure for sorting and storing crops; the development of a labor force ready to tackle the skilled work of farming; the rise of retailers that can handle a more diverse and chaotic fresh-produce supply chain; and (not mentioned in the episode) some sort of land reform to open access to the next generation of farmers, now competing with well-heeled investors and developers for acreage. The Justice for Black Farmers Act, a stalled bill sponsored by Sen. Cory Booker (D.-N.J.), provides a blueprint for doing just that. 

I finished the Hot Farm episode with a feeling much like the one I felt when I finished writing my book: a sense of hope and even optimism mixed with dread. Like all the economic transformations made necessary by accelerating climate change, revamping our food system to adapt to California’s grim water situation is going to be extremely difficult—but it’s also eminently possible. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate