A Few Things to Know About Trump’s New Impeachment Lawyers

Former Baylor President Ken Starr waits to run onto the field before an NCAA college football game 2015. LM Otero/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Ahead of the Senate impeachment trial that will move forward on January 21, President Donald Trump on Friday hired two new additions to his legal team: former Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton impeachment prosecutor Kenneth Starr. This duo will be busy assisting Trump as he tries to fend off charges that he abused presidential power by withholding military aid to Ukraine.

But Dershowitz and Starr may also have to fend off scrutiny of their own baggage. Before they joined Trump’s legal team and served as talking heads on Fox News, Dershowitz, who will reportedly make the oral arguments during the impeachment proceedings, and Starr played roles in helping wealthy financier Jeffery Epstein escape with a lenient plea deal in 2008.

Epstein faced multiple counts of soliciting and trafficking underage girls. Dershowitz helped discredit some of Epstein’s accusers and helped negotiate a “non-prosecution agreement” between Epstein and federal prosecutors in Florida under the helm of then-US attorney Alexander Acosta. Starr also served on Epstein’s legal team. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two state charges of prostitution, one involving a minor, and avoid federal charges, even though Epstein reportedly continued to abuse girls. The legal team made the deal without informing Epstein’s accusers and the deal itself granted immunity for “potential co-conspirators.”

Acosta later reportedly said he felt immense pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, including Starr and Dershowitz, during the deal. Acosta would eventually become Trump’s labor secretary and would later resign in the wake of criticism over his role in the Epstein case. In 2019, Epstein, who faced trafficking charges in New York, died by suicide in a Manhattan facility. 

Ken Starr became a household name during former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment proceedings. But fewer people followed Starr’s career moves after the Clinton presidency. In 2010, Starr became president of Baylor University. Arguably the most striking part of his tenure came toward the end: In 2016, Baylor split ties with Starr after an external review found that university officials failed to implement Title IX as it mishandled sexual assault cases involving several football players at the university going back to 2009.

During Starr’s tenure, Baylor’s football program, led by Art Briles, won two Big 12 championship titles. While the team’s performance seemed on the surface like a major success story, it was later revealed that Baylor’s athletics department and its football program had been botching its own inquiries into allegations of sexual assault against players. Baylor ultimately ousted Briles in May 2016. 

As my colleague Madison Pauly and I detailed in 2016, investigators for Pepper Hamilton, the law firm hired to conduct the Baylor investigation, found “institutional failures” at “every level.” 

Specifically

The choices made by football staff and athletics leadership, in some instances, posed a risk to campus safety and the integrity of the University. In certain instances, including reports of a sexual assault by multiple football players, athletics and football personnel affirmatively chose not to report sexual violence.

Starr stayed mostly quiet when allegations of sexual violence surfaced on campus. After he announced he would step down as chancellor in June 2016, Starr told ESPN that he “didn’t know what was happening” regarding the university’s handling of sexual assault allegations but accepted responsibility “as a matter of conscience.” “The captain goes down with the ship,” Starr said.

Since then, Starr has been a constant presence on Fox News. It’ll be worth watching what role he’ll will play in defending Trump, who once called the former Clinton prosecutor a “lunatic” and “off his rocker.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate