Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Peter Suderman calls out President Obama as a tax cheat today. “If you make less than a quarter of a million dollars a year,” Obama said on the campaign trail, “you will not see a single dime of your taxes go up.” But according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, taxpayers earning less than $200,000 a year will pay nearly $4 billion more in taxes in 2019 thanks to a change in the medical expense deduction mandated by the recently passed healthcare reform bill. J’accuse!

Well, maybe. But I need some help here. When Obama made his campaign pledge, he was talking about his comprehensive tax plan. He wasn’t promising that no bill he ever signed would ever raise taxes in any way for the under-$200,000 crowd, was he?

I’d like to set the record straight on this because it keeps coming up over and over and over. It came up in the context of an increase in cigarette taxes. It came up in the context of cap-and-trade. Now it’s come up in the context of the healthcare bill — which has other tax increases that would hit middle class families too. (Why do you think unions were opposed to the excise tax?) So: did Obama promise to never raise taxes in any context for any purpose for all time for everyone making less than $200,000? Or was it always just in the context of his specific campaign tax plan?

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate