Donald Trump Goes Berserk Over Charlottesville, Doubles Down on “Both Sides Are Bad”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After being forced to make a statement condemning neo-Nazis yesterday, Donald Trump went berserk today at a press conference that he hoped would be about infrastructure. First up: Why did he wait so long to make a statement?

I want to know the facts….As I said — remember this, Saturday — “we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence. It has no place in America,” and then I went on from there….So, making the statement when I made it was excellent.

“And then I went on from there.” Uh huh. Even though he was reading from a printed version of his remarks that he pulled out of his pocket, Trump somehow forgot the part where he said “on many sides, on many sides.” Trump didn’t condemn white nationalists, he just condemned violence and hatred in general. Next question: did he miss an opportunity to bring the country together?

Not at all. I think the country — look, you take a look. I’ve created over a million jobs since I’m president. The country is booming, the stock market is setting records. We have the highest employment numbers we’ve ever had in the history of our country. We’re doing record business. We have the highest levels of enthusiasm….I had to see the facts, unlike a lot of reporters — unlike a lot of reporters. I didn’t know David Duke was there. I wanted to see the facts, and the facts as they started coming out were very well-stated. In fact, everybody said, “His statement was beautiful. If he would have made it sooner, that would have been good.” I couldn’t have made it sooner because I didn’t know all of the facts.

The economy is doing great! So who cares if David Duke was there? Next question: what do you think of the alt-right? At this point, Trump is getting pretty red in the face:

What about the alt-left that came charging at the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? What about the fact they came charging with clubs in their hand? Do they have any problems? I think they do….Wait a minute, I’m not finished, fake news….You had a group on one side that was bad and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent, and nobody wants to say that.

Yeah, what about the counter-protesters? Nobody ever wants to say that the people who are against racism are really bad too. Luckily, Donald is around to speak truth to power. Next question: is the alt-left really equivalent to neo-Nazis?

Not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists, by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee….So this week it’s Robert E. Lee….I wonder, is it George Washington next week, and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?

But the neo-Nazis started it, right?

You had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides….You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, and the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.

Um, but what about the rally on Friday night?

I looked the night before. If you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee….You had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest, because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit, the other group didn’t have a permit…..There are two sides to a story.

That rally was organized by Richard Spencer, a leader of the alt-right. Here’s the Washington Post’s report:

“Stay in formation!” barked an organizer carrying a bullhorn. “Two by two! Two by two!” Within minutes, marchers lit their torches. Additional organizers, wearing earpieces and carrying radios, ran up and down the line shouting directions.

“Now! Now! Go!” The marchers took off at a brisk pace and immediately began yelling slogans: “Blood and soil!” “You will not replace us!” “Jews will not replace us!”

That sounds pretty quiet and innocent, all right. What a disgrace. And speaking of that, here’s the latest list of CEOs who have quit Trump’s manufacturing council:

If there’s a single name left on this list by the end of the day, their board should immediately fire them for gross stupidity and obtuseness.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate