Passing a Tax Bill Should Be Easy. Here’s Why It Isn’t.

Alex Edelman via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Here’s a headline in the Wall Street Journal today:

Steven Mnuchin, a Newcomer, Tilts at Washington’s Hardest Target: The Tax Code

I’d like to suggest a small rewrite:

Steven Mnuchin, a Newcomer, Takes a Swing at Washington’s Easiest Meatball: The Tax Code

Let’s get serious. Ronald Reagan passed three big tax bills and a bunch of smaller ones. George H.W. Bush passed a big tax bill. Bill Clinton passed a big tax bill. George W. Bush passed two big tax bills. Even Barack Obama sort of passed a tax bill.

Passing a tax bill is the easiest gimme in Washington. Passing a tax bill when Republicans control every branch of government is a hanging curve that a 10-year-old could hit out of the park. The fact that Mnuchin is having trouble with a tax bill is yet another sign of the fundamental incompetence of the Trump administration and the Republicans in Congress.

So why are people taking seriously the idea that Mnuchin is attempting a triple backflip with sprinkles on top? I think it’s because he’s persuaded everyone that Republicans are trying to pass tax reform, like the 1986 bill. That really was hard. But no one in Congress has ever been serious about tax reform. They just want to pass a huge rate cut, and they’re casting around for various ways to make the total revenue hit a little smaller. That means finding exemptions and tax credits here and there that have weak constituencies and can therefore be killed off without too much blowback. The state tax exemption, which mostly hits blue states, is a perfect example.

But this kind of aimless target seeking is in no way tax reform. It’s just an attempt to cut rates on zillionaires and big corporations without blowing up the deficit too badly. This lack of any real bearings is one reason why putting the bill together is so hard. Every loophole in the tax code has a constituency of some kind that will fight to keep it, and Republicans aren’t willing to fight back because they’ve never had any real commitment to eliminating them in the first place. This is why they fold at the first sign of resistance. In their hearts, they just want rate cuts, not a more efficient tax code. And needless to say, Donald Trump couldn’t care less either way.

Steve Mnuchin isn’t having a hard time because he’s a newcomer. It’s because nobody in the Republican Party has any real moorings anymore. They don’t believe in broadening the base. They don’t believe that tax cuts pay for themselves. They don’t believe that reducing top marginal rates supercharges the economy. They don’t believe that corporations are going to use foreign profits to boost US investments if they’re allowed to repatriate it at low rates. They don’t even believe that big deficits—aka “starving the beast”—will rein in spending. They want tax cuts because—well, because they’ve always wanted tax cuts. Wasn’t that Ronald Reagan’s big lesson to the party?

And so they’re having a tough time. They’re trying to pass a tax bill, but no one really understands why they want a tax bill in the first place. That’s hardly a recipe for success.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate