Here are my ten favorite charts of 2017. They’re in no particular order. Some are here because they represent something important, and some are just interesting tidbits. But they’re all things that are worth knowing.

#1. James Comey.

Yes, it was James Comey who was responsible for putting Donald Trump in the White House. The whole, overwhelming case is here if you feel like reliving your worst nightmare once again.

#2. Confederate monuments.

Statues of Confederate leaders weren’t put up to commemorate the war dead. They were put up decades later as part of a campaign to prop up Jim Crow and white supremacy.

#3. Global competitiveness.

I don’t think anybody would say that the US response to the Great Recession was ideal. The stimulus was too small, homeowners were ill treated, bankers got off scot-free, and middle-class household wealth plummeted. That said, we probably handled it better than anyone else, thanks mostly to Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Ben Bernanke. Remember that.

#4. Kansas.

It’s possible to run a real-world test of what happens when you adopt full-bore conservative economic principles, and Kansas did it. After electing right-wing zealot Sam Brownback governor, taxes on the rich went down; taxes on the middle class went up; and spending on social programs plummeted. “Our new pro-growth tax policy will be like a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy,” he said. It turned out to be more like a shot of cyanide.

#5. Wind and solar power.

The true, long-term cost of wind and solar power has finally gotten to the point where it’s competitive with fossil fuels. In some areas it’s even cheaper, and for solar in particular the cost is going to keep coming down. To a certain extent, this means that Donald Trump’s plan to repeal Obama-era carbon regulations matters less than he thinks, since fossil-based power sources are rapidly becoming too expensive to bother with. This is already true of coal, and will probably be true of oil and gas before long too. In ten years, all newly built power plants will likely be based on renewable sources purely because they make the most economic sense. If we were smart, though, we’d use public policy to hasten that day.

#6. Female surgeons.

When male surgeons unexpectedly lose a patient on the operating table, they suffer few consequences from their peers. After all, it’s one of those things that happens sometimes when you’re in a risky business. But when female surgeons lose a patient, primary care doctors take it as a reflection on their competence and reduce their referrals.

#7. Life expectancy.

In America, the rich live more than ten years longer than the poor. Keep this in mind the next time someone suggests that we should raise the Social Security retirement age. For the poorest Americans, it would mean they’d receive Social Security payments for only about six or seven years before they died. But the rich would barely notice it.

#8. Income by age group.

Over the past 40 years, the demographic group that has experienced the slowest income group is young adults. The elderly have seen the fastest income growth. It’s long past time that we focus a little less on seniors and a little more on why the young and middle-aged have done so poorly for four consecutive decades.

#9. Ballot order.

In high-profile races for offices like president or senator, it doesn’t much matter what order the names appear on the ballot. But for lower profile races, ballot order has a huge effect. The first name on the ballot can gain 4-10 percent more votes just for being first. Always randomize your ballots, even within precincts

#10. White votes for Donald Trump.

Donald Trump won a lower share of the white vote than Mitt Romney did in 2012. This was true not just nationwide, but in most towns and cities within the top 50 metro areas. But there’s one place where Trump did really well with whites: in communities that are more than 90 percent white. As with so many other things, fear of minorities decreases when people see minorities on a regular basis. It’s in places where they aren’t visible that white fear can be most easily stoked by outfits like Fox News and demagogues like Trump.

And two bonus charts.

These should be at the top of everyone’s mind all the time, every year. The first is CO2 emissions. The second is America’s astronomical cost of health care.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate