Don’t Blame Boomers, Blame Their Parents

Since I’m being cranky today, I might as well stay cranky. Over at Vox, fellow boomer David Goldstein says that our generation ruined college for everyone else:

Boomers like me have pulled up the ladder behind us after being educated largely at taxpayer expense. No wonder young people have piled up more than $1.5 trillion in student debt.

Boomers need some defense here, and I’m going to do it in a time-honored way: by blaming everything on our parents. Here’s a look at tuition at the University of California over the past half century:

UC tuition was free until the late ’60s, when Gov. Ronald Reagan pressed the California legislature to impose a tuition charge. This took the form of an “educational fee,” and this is where it all started. At the time, boomers were about 18 years old on average and had nothing to do with it. Reagan was a member of the Greatest Generation, and so were most members of the legislature.

The next increase came in the early ’80s. Boomers were about 30 and still had little to do with it. The governor at the time was Jerry Brown, a member of the Silent Generation. Ditto for most of the legislature.

The next increase came in the early ’90s. The governor was Pete Wilson, another member of the Silent Generation. The legislature was younger than that, and it’s not until this point that there are finally a fair number of boomers who have to take some blame.

Long story short, the whole concept of charging tuition started with the Greatest Generation and then continued forever once they had set the example. So if you’re going to blame anyone for “pulling up the ladder,” it’s the two generations before the baby boomers, who really did get lots of government bennies and then staged a tax revolt and methodically took them away. On a national level, the modern era of limited government was a product of the Reagan era, and was created by Reagan himself (Greatest Gen) and members of Congress at the time (mostly Greatest and Silent gens). They’re the ones who cut taxes on the rich. They’re the ones who pared back Social Security. They’re the ones responsible for mass incarceration. They’re the ones who blew up antitrust law. They’re the ones who made corporate deregulation into a religion. They’re the ones who turned abortion into an endless political brawl. They’re the ones, exemplified by Alan Greenspan (b. 1926) who created the housing bubble. They’re the ones, starting with Newt Gingrich (b. 1943) and continuing all the way through Mitch McConnell (b. 1942), who transformed American politics into a bloodsport. Boomers simply didn’t have much to do with this. For most of this time, they were too young to have any serious influence.

Now, if you want to blame boomers for welfare reform, sure. Bill Clinton was (barely) a boomer. If you want to blame boomers for the Iraq War, I guess so. George Bush was (barely) a boomer—though the real force behind it was Dick Cheney (b. 1941). If you want to blame us for screwing up Obamacare, that seems sort of churlish, but whatever. Barack Obama was (barely) a boomer—though the real roadblock to a public option was Joe Lieberman (b. 1942) and his centrist pals.

But the fact is that boomers have mostly been left out of power. Not a single person born between 1947-1960 has ever been president. Clinton, Bush, and Trump were all born in 1946¹ and are only barely boomers at all.² Obama was born in 1961 and is more Gen X in outlook than boomer. The entire 1950s heart of the baby boom generation has been shut out.

In any case, it wasn’t us who took everything away from the rest of you. Blame our parents instead.

POSTSCRIPT: For the record, I don’t think that dividing people up into generations makes a lot of sense, and I don’t really blame the Greatest Gen or the Silent Gen for anything. Like all of us, they did their best and ended up with the usual mixed record of good (the Civil Rights Act) and bad (getting us into Vietnam). Ditto for boomers and Xers and millennials.

I just get tired of the whole “boomers pulled up the ladder” thing. If you’re going to play the generational blame game, at least get your generations right.

¹In fact, all three were born in the summer of 1946. What the hell was in the water in the fall of 1945?

²Although they all evaded the draft, which counts for something, I suppose.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate