Democrats Need to Make Republicans Pay a Price for Filling Ginsburg’s Seat

Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Is there any way to stop Republicans from filling Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat? Probably not. There are plenty of ideas floating around, but most of them require the support of either three or four Republicans, which Democrats aren’t likely to get.¹ No one should take this as a counsel of despair, though. Even if the odds favor Republicans in this battle, there’s still the question of how they can be made to pay the biggest price for it.

And they can be. For a long time, many voters have vaguely assumed that Republicans were all talk. Sure, they’re always yakking about eliminating the income tax or getting rid of the EPA or some other kind of nutbaggery. But Republicans have been yakking like this for so long—and not delivering—that it seems more like a secret password than a genuine expression of what they want to accomplish. It’s just the price of admission for a career in Republican politics.

But now all these voters are going to wake up. Republicans are finally within reach of one of their longtime goals and people are suddenly going to have to take all the nutbaggery seriously. Do they want to vote for a party that might really and truly eliminate the right to an abortion? Because now it’s right in front of their faces.

We liberals like to gripe about how Republicans are always appealing to fear. But we can do it too—and we do when the subject is, say, cuts to Medicare. This is what’s called for now: a massive campaign based on stoking fear about abortion being banned once and for all. Sure, it would stay legal in some states even if Roe v. Wade is overturned, but in plenty of others it would almost instantly be made illegal. That’s scary. Even in conservative Southern states there are lots of middle-class women who are going to think twice when they’re faced squarely with that—and their numbers have been growing for decades.

As for the party bases, the Republican base (1) already votes, and (2) has been energized about Supreme Court appointments for a long time. It’s unlikely that the Ginsburg replacement will increase their turnout much. On the Democratic side, it’s just the opposite. The base has been more concerned with other things for a long time and is not all that thrilled with Joe Biden and his moderate talking points. But now? With abortion about to go the way of the dodo bird? They are going to be energized into action like you’ve rarely seen. At a guess, this affair will boost Democratic turnout by three or four points.

This is turning into a Republican habit. They tried passing photo ID laws but that had little effect, possibly because publicity surrounding the laws increased turnout enough to wash out the reduced turnout from the laws themselves. Donald Trump has been amping up the racism, but it’s likely that he’s losing more votes than he’s gaining from it. Abortion, if Democrats play it right, will be a lot like that. The net effect will be Democratic gains and Republican losses.

But only if it’s played right. The Democratic base needs to finally be as energized about this stuff as they should have been all along, and center-right voters need to be punched in the gut with fear about what the Republican nutbags are finally going to actually do.

¹There’s also the idea of the House voting out impeachment charges on a daily basis and sending them over to the Senate, which is required to act on them before other business. However, this is basically the trillion-dollar coin of partisan obstruction, and it’s just not going to happen.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate