Liveblogging the First Trump-Biden Debate

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Well. That was quite a show, wasn’t it? I’ve never seen a debate moderator tell a sitting president to shut up even once, let alone over and over. But Chris Wallace did.

Thanks to Donald Trump’s inability to keep his mind on a single subject for more than a few seconds, there was no real arc to this debate. It sort of swerved and veered from one spot to another based on whatever lies and conspiracy theories popped into Trump’s mind at any given moment. But fact checking, as Biden said, is pointless. I suppose a few brave souls will do one, but it almost misses the point. Of course Trump was lying constantly. That’s just part of his persona and everyone knows it. The question is more about the literary quality of his lies, and tonight I’d judge the literary quality pretty low. Trump was obviously trying to deliver a toned-down version of his rally speeches, but that doesn’t work well in a more serious debate format. Being nothing more than an insult machine turns people off on a stage like this.

And what about Trump’s unwillingness to condemn white supremacist groups? And his unwillingness to urge his followers to stay calm after the election? If those get the 24/7 cable news treatment, it could—and should!—do Trump some serious harm.

Biden was OK. He did his best to deal with Trump’s blizzard of lies without being consumed by them, and that’s a tough thing to do. It’s hard to say if Biden managed to get his points across in the face of Trump’s constant interruptions and bizarre attacks, but I think he did. He also successfully managed to present himself as something more than just an insult machine, which should appeal to moderates. He came across as a decent person, which Trump certainly didn’t do.

Trump’s fans will probably be happy with his performance. He hit all the weird right-wing obsessions that they love so much. But Biden fans will also be happy. He did fine and didn’t stumble or backtrack too much. I think Biden might have won a few votes tonight, but overall, as usual, my guess is that this debate changed very few minds.


It’s time for the big debate. Let’s get to it.

10:38 – And that’s a wrap.

10:36 – Trump is all but guaranteeing that if he loses he will take to the streets claiming the election was a fraud.

10:27 – Trump is trying over and over to tie Biden to the “radical left.” I don’t think it’s working, but what do I know?

10:23 – Trump is going hard on the Green New Deal, claiming it will destroy the economy.

10:17 – Trump just can’t help himself. He simply has to get every single insult out.

10:11 – Hillary!

9:55 – Trump says Biden called Black criminals “superpredators” in 1994. That’s not true.

9:50 – Chris Wallace is doing his best to shut Trump up, but no one can shut Trump up.

9:45 – Trump is just a whirlwind of stream of consciousness attacks and insults.

9:43 – Trump says he paid “millions of dollars” in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017.

9:42 – Trump: “I brought back football.”

9:31 – Trump is now insisting that Biden is stupid. Literally. “Don’t ever use the word smart with me.”

9:20 – Biden: “Will you shut up please.”

9:17 – Biden: “I’m not here to call out his lies. Everybody knows he’s a liar.”

9:12 – Biden: “I am the Democratic Party.”

9:09 – First question is about Amy Coney Barrett. Biden doesn’t say a word about abortion. He focuses solely on Obamacare.

8:55 – Trump has spent the past week claiming that Joe Biden is a doddering old man who’s an embarrassment to the nation, and today the entire right-wing noise machine has kicked into high gear to back him up. This may seem dumb, but it probably isn’t. What they’re doing is priming us. They want everyone to be hyper-attentive to Biden’s performance, ready to criticize him every time he halts or corrects himself or stumbles over something. Even those of us who think we’re immune really aren’t. My advice: if you look at past debates, you’ll see that everyone stumbles a bit here and there. We just don’t notice it. So calm down and ignore the presentation on both sides unless something really grisly happens.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate