Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The World War II folk songs on That’s Why We’re Marching (Smithsonian/Folkways, 1996) are catchy, but then they had to be–they’re pro-paganda. Written and performed by folk legends such as Lead Belly (above), Woody Guthrie, and Pete Seeger, the songs render the wartime political landscape in broad strokes, from pacifist pleas to hawkish anti-Hitler rants. Including previously unreleased archival tapes, the album offers insight into popular opinion on the front lines as well as the home front.

Crimes and Splendors: The Desert Cantos of Richard Misrach (Boston: Bulfinch Press, 1996) is a disarming series of photographs documenting life and death in America’s desolate salt flats and deserts. Misrach’s subject matter varies wildly–from military test-bombing, to fire, to floods, to Playboy magazines used for target practice–but the intriguing collection lends political weight to even the most mundane of landscapes.

The concept of “noise” as music isn’t new, but it’s changed since the Cabaret Voltaire in 1919. Its newest incarnation, Offbeat: A Red Hot Sound Trip (Wax Trax!/TVT, 1996) drifts between ambient melodies and haunting sound collages. Released by the Red Hot Organization to benefit AIDS research, the album features familiar rock stars, including David Byrne, as well as newer luminaries such as My Bloody Valentine, Tortoise, and Laika.

James B. Twitchell’s Adcult USA: The Triumph of Advertising in American Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996) hits us with some simple concepts: As much as we hate to admit it, we love being advertised to; and, as much as we would like to resist Madison Avenue, it has already shaped much of American culture. Going beyond a study of subliminal codes, Adcult looks objectively at the work that goes into ads, as well as the work they perform on society.

Race relations in America, Jennifer L. Hochschild says, are at least partly determined by the collision of the American expectation of success with the reality of class structures. In Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class and the Soul of the Nation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995), Hochschild uses numerous surveys to analyze race and class differences qualitatively, yet she wisely gives credence to intangible distinctions.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate