The Best of What’s New

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Before his death in 1991 at age 62, French pop provocateur Serge Gainsbourg took on multiple musical personalities. Most of them make their way onto Couleur Caf&eacute, Du Jazz dans le Ravin, and Comic Strip (Mercury Records, 1996), three recent compilations that capture vintage Gainsbourg between 1958 and 1975. Loaded with charm, irreverence, and pockets of awkward eroticism, they follow his metamorphoses, from the Afro-Latin mambos and cha-cha-chas of Couleur Caf&eacute to the cabaret jazz of Du Jazz dans le Ravin to Comic Strip‘s giddy pop celebrations of Americana, which include his unforgettable duet with Brigitte Bardot on “Bonnie and Clyde.”

Thanks to a very limited release, most people missed one of the best films of last year. Now out on video, The Wife (Orion Home Video, 1997), which has little plot to speak of, is a discomfiting dissection of unhappy New Agers getting loaded over an impromptu dinner in a remote farmhouse. Tom Noonan — an undervalued actor best known for his oddball roles in everything from Mystery Train to Last Action Hero — wrote and directed the film, and delivers an unsettling performance as a psychotherapist who looks like a biblical prophet. Julie Hagerty (who plays his wife), Wallace Shawn, and Karen Young are creepy and mesmerizing as his dinner companions. So tense and visually complex it’s practically gothic horror, The Wife takes a bitter look at the institution of marriage. It’s no surprise that few American moviegoers paid to feel this uncomfortable.

Clicking InIn Clicking In: Hot Links to a Digital Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1996), editor Lynn Hershman Leeson has assembled an eclectic mix of essays and interviews that examine how cyberculture is changing the way we think about identity, community, physicality, art, and commerce. Amid all the talk of cyborgs and multiuser dungeons, viruses and virtual reality, the book has moments that are plain old silly (for example, the description of a guy whose various online identities include a “seductive woman,” a “macho cowboy type,” and a “rabbit of unspecified gender”). You may find yourself asking, “Who are these people? Are they for real?” The questions would probably delight Leeson and her contributors, most of whom are attracted to the digital world precisely because it challenges our conceptions of real/reality. Clicking In can be a bit dizzying and unfocused — some pieces veer off into academic cyberspeak. However, once you get your bearings, the collection provides a comprehensive introduction to this brave new world. The book also comes with a well-designed, funky CD-ROM.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate