Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


David Eggers and David Moodie, the 20-something founding editors of Might magazine, now cringe when they think of their alternative bimonthly’s first issue in 1994, which they describe as a “really earnest angsty-youth-kind-of-thing.” Since then, Might’s snarky social commentary has attracted much-deserved praise from its urban trendsetting readership — who appreciate the magazine’s countercultural, funnier-than-Spy-in-the-’80s tone, as well as its contributions from writers such as David Foster Wallace. Within a single issue, the duo recently examined the metamorphosis of yuppies into arpies (affluent recreating professionals); fantasized about being alone in a hotel room with author Joan Didion; and defended the heretofore indefensible, including bookstore chains, Pat Buchanan, and that misunderstood condiment, mayonnaise. Mother Jones asked Eggers and Moodie what they’ve been reading and listening to lately. Here’s what they had to say about Benetton’s Colors magazine:

“People complain that Colors is simply an advertisement for the clothing manufacturer, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. There are, on average, only two Benetton ads each issue and only a few other ads — leaving room for a thorough exploration of the subject at hand. Each issue has a broad and seemingly simple theme — death, sex, work — but the editors approach the subject matter from so many perfectly original angles that they make any topic seem completely fresh. It’s the most brilliant photography-based magazine in the world.”

The duo also recommends:

The Animals’ Voice. “The vast majority of the world’s magazines are trade publications, and reading one of them is like entering a strange new world, with its own weird language and iconography. My new favorite (which recently merged with The Animals’ Agenda) is for animal rights activists but has such a strange, shrill take on the subject that it’s truly bizarre, often terrifying, and frequently — inadvertently — hilarious. A cover from last year listed four main features: Animal Rights. Animal Emotions. Tuna & Dolphins. Pierce Brosnan.”

Sound of Lies by the Jayhawks. “They’re sort of a country-rock outfit, which I’ve never been a huge fan of or anything, but this album is so well crafted, so full of wonderful songs, that I often find myself looking forward to listening to it. With the recent popularity of bands like Wilco and Son Volt, it would be nice to see this record get some exposure, but because the band has been around awhile and has no MTV potential, it’ll probably disappear, like most of the best albums do.”

The Acme Novelty Library Great Big Book of Jokes by Chris Ware. “This is no joke book. Ware’s work is among the very best graphic, comic, illustrative, and fine artwork being produced in the world right now. It’s almost always sad stuff, about existential aloneness and unrequited love, but technically it’s so stunning that it leaves you breathless.”

Stay Free. “A byproduct of the ‘zine explosion is the advent of ‘zines that are too slick and smart to be called ‘zines — a term that implies messy layouts and puerile content — and too small to be called magazines. So I call them ‘metazines.’ One that caught my eye recently is Stay Free, which concerns itself with puncturing rampant commercialism. The latest issue critiqued marketing to kids, but was not above waxing nostalgic about the toys of our youth.”

“Iron Chef.” “This frenetic Tokyo-based syndicated cooking show (with subtitles) is unlike anything produced here. In one studio, three chefs in three kitchens face off to create a gourmet meal with the show’s mandated ingredients. The action is breathless and the coverage is straight ESPN — all roving, handheld close-ups and play-by-play commentary (‘Looks like eggplant to me…. Yes, he added the eggplant!’) as three people simply cook.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate