Going Antiballistic

Five entertaining, if unscientific, takes on missile defense

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


While Strategic Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld sermonizes about space-based weaponry, President Bush has made a missile shield the centerpiece of his defense policy. We find it fitting that these systems, inspired as they are by science fiction, have returned the favor on occasion by spawning their own creative flights of fancy.

 

The Cardinal of the Kremlin
Tom Clancy. Putnam. $27.95.
Cold Warnographer Tom Clancy delves deeply into the intricacies of missile defense in this 1988 “page-turner.” The CIA’s highest-ranking mole—code-named Cardinal—has gained access to the Kremlin’s plans for a missile-zapping laser that could shift the global balance of power. Unflappable protagonist Jack Ryan globe-trots in pursuit of Cardinal, desperate to reach our man before KGB goons do.

SDI
Sega. 1987. (Download at Classicgaming.com)
In this arcade game, you find yourself immersed in the Gipper’s Dream—or is it his nightmare? Controlling an SDI satellite, you must destroy an endless stream of Soviet nukes. In a touch of realism, the satellite proves ineffective against the massive enemy arsenal—and is as apt to crash into space junk as to intercept a warhead.

Colossus: The Forbin Project
Joseph Sargent. Universal. 1970. 100 minutes.
In this missile-defense epic, Dr. Charles Forbin invents a supercomputer—Colossus—to operate U.S. nuclear defenses. But once plugged in, the machine detects its heretofore unknown Soviet counterpart and demands the two systems be networked. The combined computers soon grow so awesomely powerful that the president orders them decoupled. Enraged, Colossus demands to be reconnected, and, as blackmail, launches two missiles. The reconnection is completed, but only in time for Colossus to intercept one of the nukes. Proving the point: Computers don’t stop ballistic missiles; people do.

Star Wars With the Gipper
In this oddly addictive Web game, you’re Ronnie, and Ronnie’s a superhero! Use your laser-beam eyes to destroy the Evil Empire’s war satellites. This game is kinder to Reagan’s pipe dream than Sega’s SDI is: Crippling the Soviets is child’s play, and at each explosion the Stetsoned Gipper lets loose a “Yee-haw!”

Airborne Laser
Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. In this honest-to-God Air Force project, a laser will be mounted inside a 747 jumbo jet to fry missiles leaving enemy airspace. If the weapon sounds kooky, the official Web site is all the more so. On the homepage, the airliner’s laser-equipped nose cone tracks your mouse, firing whenever you click. There’s also a collection of technical drawings (above) that suggests the masterwork of a G.I. Joe-addled 13-year-old.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate