The Movie is the Message

<i>Hotel Rwanda</i> didn’t win an Oscar, but that’s not the way to measure its success.

Photo: AFP Imageforum

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


One of the biggest success stories of this year’s Oscars was a movie that didn’t win anything. Hotel Rwanda, a bleak, harrowing film about mass slaughter and the moral failure of the West, picked up three nominations — for best actor, supporting actress, and screenplay; pretty good going for a limited-release movie about that almost didn’t get made for lack of funds. An Oscar wouldn’t have hurt, of course, but the nominations alone vastly increased the film’s visibility — and, crucially, that of its subject, the 1994 Rwandan genocide.

The ambitions of Hotel Rwanda, which tells the true story of Paul Rusesabagina, a Hutu (played by Don Cheadle) who saves the lives of more than a thousand Tutsis by sheltering them at the high-class hotel he manages, are quite explicit. Director Terry George has said, “Politicians from around the world have made the pilgrimage to Rwanda to ask for forgiveness from the survivors” and to promise they will stop genocide in the future. “But it’s happening yet again in Sudan, or the Congo, or some [other] place where life is worth less than dirt.”

Hotel Rwanda is an act of memory against forgetting, a reminder to the world — from presidents and policy makers to ordinary people in front of their TVs–that it turned away as 800,000 people were butchered, in plain sight, in 100 days.
(There’s a quiet but telling moment in the film where an American photojournalist, on viewing film footage of a massacre, sadly observes, ” “people will see it, say ‘Oh, that’s awful,’ and go back to their dinners.” And so it proved.) And it’s a summons to act now — to give meaning to the words “Never again.”

Even before the Oscar nominations, the film had generated a great deal of public and private interest, thanks in large part to a publicity team comprising, in addition to PR types, humanitarian organizations and nonprofits dedicated to grassroots change. Amnesty International has had the largest hand in advocating for Hotel Rwanda, its effort spearheaded by Bonnie Abaunza, the director of Artists for Amnesty, a program that, as the name suggests, promotes Amnesty’s work through the arts.

When she first heard about Hotel Rwanda, Abaunza approached MGM/United Artists with a proposal: Amnesty would mobilize its membership to promote the film; the film, in turn, would help generate interest and contributions for Amnesty’s biggest current campaign: the fight for humanitaritan relief and international action in Darfur, Sudan, where an ethnic cleansing campaign has caused tens of thousands of deaths and made refugees of more than 1.8 million people. The UN has called the conflict the worst humanitarian crisis in the world; millions are expected to die of hunger and disease anyway. Although response to Sudan has been better than response to the Rwandan genocide, says Abaunza, it still falls short of what is needed.

Emphasizing the similarities between the two crises, Amnesty has launched a far-reaching publicity campaign, mobilizing members not only to see the film but to get everyone they know to the theater.

Star power, too, has been pressed into service on behalf of the film. At the Los Angeles premiere, sponsored by Amnesty, co-hosts Angelina Jolie and Harrison Ford called attention to the conflict in Darfur, reiterating the film’s underlying message: “We didn’t stop it ten years ago, we have to stop it now.” A single photo of the stars at the premier that ran that week in People magazine ended up drawing hundreds of calls and donations. In all, the event drew in over $25,000 for Amnesty’s work in Darfur.

With an eye to the future, Amnesty has made a point of reaching out to a younger demographic, sponsoring screenings at colleges across the country, from Idaho State to Harvard. In November, the film screened at an academic conference on African-American and African studies. Targeting these educators is crucial, says Abaunza, as they will bring Hotel Rwanda’s message into the classroom.

George and the head of Amnesty’s Human Rights Education Program also developed a teaching guide that high-school teachers can use in conjunction with the film to help students understand and analyze the Rwandan genocide. The guide helps teachers relate the lessons of the film to contemporary conflicts like Sudan, and uses Rusesabagina’s story to emphasize the importance of individual action.

In an effort to keep that message fresh, MGM and Amnesty recently filmed six public service announcements that aired on MTV’s college channel, mtvU, in late February. In the PSAs, Don Cheadle, Nick Nolte, Paul Rusesabagina, Wyclef Jean and Director Terry George appeal to the global community (and particularly its young audience) to help end the genocide in Sudan.

“There’s nothing more effective than the energy of youth,” she says. Abaunza knows — or at least hopes — that, if she returns to students six months after they saw Hotel Rwanda and reminds them that the killing in Darfur has not stopped, they will be ready and willing to help.

Publicity efforts have also been targeted at policy makers. In mid-December, the film was shown at the US State Department. The Open Forum, a state department committee that brings alternative policy recommendations to the Secretary of State, hosted the event. The movie screened for 600 current and former state employees; some had been intimately involved in making policy decisions about Rwanda and are currently involved in decisions on Sudan.

Joyce Leader, who was second in command at the US Embassy in Rwanda, was also in the audience. Leader says the film brought back powerful memories: “It left me shaking and shaking.” Particular scenes resonated with her own experiences in Rwanda, notably the shots of militia and other Hutus who would later kill thousands of their countrymen, crowding the streets.

As Leader left Kigali in a convoy in 1994 (the U.S. evacuated all Americans when the genocide began), she remembers looking down from her truck at soldiers waving machetes and guns.

An additional screening at the Holocaust museum in Washington, D.C. offered congressional representatives, ambassadors and diplomats an opportunity to see the film before it was released. House Representative Ed Royce, who chairs the Africa subcommittee, and congressman Donald Payne, even sent a letter to every member of the Congress, encouraging them to attend the screening. In his letter, Royce emphasized the connection between Rwanda and the current genocide in Darfur. “Protection of human lives is paramount,” he wrote, “and lives can be saved.”

Stanislass Kamanzi, the Ambassador of Rwanda to the United Nations, saw the film at another screening in New York, co-hosted by the United Nations Refugee Agency. He was one of the few Rwandan refugees in attendance.

Kamanzi was moved to tears as the film led him through many of the emotions he felt at the time of the genocide. “It is a matter of miracle that I am alive today,” he says softly. When the killing began, Kamanzi and his family fled to a Southern province of Rwanda that offered relative safety. Before they left, they spent a night at the Hotel Mille Collines — the hotel where Paul Rusesabagina’s sheltered the Tutsis.

I asked Kamanzi whether he thinks a movie like Hotel Rwanda can change the way the international community deals with situations like Rwanda. “The movie is very important,” he said, “because it can raise awareness and communicate that genocide can happen no longer.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate