Mondovino

A new film looks at the effect of globalization on the wine industry.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Director Jonathan Nossiter, a polyglot and former sommelier, takes on the highfalutin’ world of fine wine with his controversial and politically charged documentary,
Mondovino. Nossiter, whose films include Sunday, Resident Alien, and Signs of Wonder, offers a candid introduction to the labyrinthine power dynamics at play in the world of international winemaking. By juxtaposing images of a humble Indian peasant-maker in Argentina, the small but orderly vineyards of longtime family-owned enterprises in France, and the lavish wineries of American conglomerates like Robert Mondavi, Nossiter illustrates the damage he believes corporatization and globalization are wreaking on wine.

Culling from more than 500 hours of herky-jerky footage shot on a handheld camera over the course of four years, Nossiter takes great care to compare the artisan winemakers — passionate, still, about tradition and terroir — with the activities of million-dollar Napa wineries, their cocky wine consultants, and American critics like Robert Parker, whose influence is so great that some European winemakers seem willing to cater to his penchant for deep, rich flavors. In doing so, Nossiter makes a bold accusation: the world’s wine is becoming “Americanized” in its homogeneity and its lack of sophistication and subtlety.

Adopting an anti-establishment tone that’s comparable to — if more restrained than — Michael Moore’s, Nossiter comes off as a bit of a conspiracy theorist at times. Still, he does successfully expose the borderline unethical relationships – if not outright collusion — between wineries like Mondavi, which employs popular consultant Michael Rolland (who swaggers into numerous wineries to instruct them to “micro-oxygenate”), and which ultimately lead to vintages favorable to the palate of persuasive American critics like Parker who, even with his accomplished palate, has clear preferences in wine.

A visit to an out-of-the-way wine shop in Italy is the lynchpin of Nossiter’s argument. Prodded by Nossiter, the owner emerges from behind the counter to pull a bottle from the stocked shelves. Though it’s probably been a boon to the shopkeeper’s business, that particular wine, the Italian bemusedly explains, used to cost a fraction of what it does today – the price and prestige of the label shot up after Mondavi bought part of the winery and it got a good write-up in Wine Spectator.

But Mondovino is most compelling when Nossiter allows the complexity of sustaining a modern winery to emerge. And so, it is Hubert de Montille and his family-run operation in Burgundy, which is known for its exemplary pinot noir, that tells the story best.

De Montille, who is both a curmudgeon and a romantic (“Where there’s wine, there is civilization,” he declares soon after we meet him), has turned his winery over to his son Etienne, who is more interested in marketing and building the label’s worldwide status than de Montille might prefer. Meanwhile, de Montille’s daughter Alix, who shares her father’s love for handcrafting wine, is becoming quickly jaded with her work at a large winery because she believes it has placed profit over quality. The push and pull within the de Montille family is an apt reflection of the tensions that exist when a deep and innate love for making wine collides with the forces of expansion and globalization.
Though some oenophiles have dismissed Nossiter’s assessment of the industry as an oversimplification and romanticization of wine production, Mondovino has nevertheless been a box-office hit in France and elsewhere. And despite it’s moments of proselytizing, Mondovino provides an unparalleled glimpse into the politics and culture of modern-day winemaking.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate