“This Film is Not Yet Rated” and “Fuck”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This Film Is Not Yet Rated
IFC Films. 97 minutes.

Fuck
THINKFilm. 93 minutes.

These brash documentaries cleverly take aim at Americans’ paradoxical love of free expression and deep-rooted puritanism. In This Film Is Not Yet Rated, director Kirby Dick exposes the hypocrisy of the Motion Picture Association of America’s rating system, which has been passing often arbitrary judgments on movies since 1968. Armed with a hidden camera and a hefty dose of chutzpah, and assisted by a lesbian private eye and a passel of frustrated filmmakers, he sets out to demonize former MPAA president Jack Valenti, who launched the ratings system, and to unmask the anonymous raters who can be the difference between a teen-friendly blockbuster and an adults-only bomb.

It’s not news that movie raters react more severely to explicit sex than graphic violence. But This Film teases out some interesting tidbits, including the raters’ harsh treatment of gay themes and indie films, as well as their apparent discomfort with scenes of female sexual pleasure. Dick also persuades a handful of former raters to go on the record and reveals the role played by the Christian leaders who sit in on ratings appeals. Originally, the MPAA’s system was supposed to stave off censors, yet This Film provides a disturbingly long list of filmmakers who’ve altered their movies to get an R rating, or who have been forced to accept an NC-17—a virtual kiss of death that can severely hamper a film’s distribution. Perhaps it’s no surprise to learn that this documentary’s title is a misnomer: It, too, has been slapped with an NC-17.

Sharing This Film’s anti-puritanical outlook and seriocomic tone, Steve Anderson’s Fuck is an alternately irreverent and earnest exploration of everything you ever wanted to know about the four-letter word but were afraid to ask, from its cloudy origins and linguistic versatility to its infiltration of almost every sphere of our culture. Weighing in is a balanced collection of talking heads that includes conservative film critic Michael Medved, Judith “Miss Manners” Martin, Pat Boone, Bill Maher, Deadwood writer David Milch, and the late Hunter S. Thompson. Anderson suggests that the allure of forbidden language comes in part from the specter of moral disapproval. After all, if everyone went around freely dropping f-bombs, what power or efficacy would the word have anymore? Come to think of it, as any HBO fan can attest, that is precisely what is happening, decency be damned.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate