Blocking the Courthouse Door

Stephanie Mencimer examines how “lawsuit abuse” became GOP political gold.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: A woman burns her lap with a cup of McDonald’s coffee and sues the fast-food chain to the tune of $3 million. There’s a good reason why you know this story, thanks to a decade-long campaign by Republicans, tobacco companies, and the insurance industry to awaken Americans to the dangers of “lawsuit abuse” and out-of-control juries. Here’s what you don’t know: As Stephanie Mencimer points out in this blistering book, the burned woman, Stella Liebeck, was not some yuppie rushing to work; she was a conservative 79-year-old retired department store clerk. At the time of her 1992 accident, McDonald’s had received more than 700 complaints about its coffee being too hot—including several from Cincinnati’s burn center. Liebeck’s award was reduced to $480,000, and she eventually settled for much less than $3 million. But her case had already become one of the causes célèbres of the tort reform movement.

Armed with solid research and a reformist spirit, Mencimer demonstrates how this obscure legal concept became political gold for Republicans. In 1994, Karl Rove persuaded Texas gubernatorial candidate George W. Bush to declare war on “junk lawsuits.” The issue brought doctors and small-business owners into the gop camp, and it also allowed for veiled attacks against supposedly Latino-dominated juries. Another perfect wedge issue was born.

From Texas, Mencimer follows the Republicans as they reshape the law to protect corporations from citizens’ right to a trial by jury. In terms of our democracy, the stakes could not be higher. For example, without uniform health care, the courts are the first and last resort for patients seeking redress for botched medical procedures. Malpractice cases are not simply about money. Suing a hospital is often the only way to find out what really happened. As Mencimer points out, a lot of malpractice cases are dropped once the facts are discovered in the legal process; big settlements are rare but inevitably make headlines. She convincingly corrects many other misperceptions about ambulance-chasing lawyers, “jackpot” juries, and the notion that frivolous lawsuits have made our lives more expensive. But everyone hates a lawyer—until they need one.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate