Seeing Red

D.C.’s Textile Museum offers a new exhibit in primary colors.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Unless for those inclined to collect quilts or obsess about knit quality, an exhibit of textiles and fabrics probably wouldn’t turn most people on. But the Textile Museum of Washington, D.C. has added the color of passion to their latest exhibit, “RED.”

In time for Valentine’s Day, the exhibit illustrates the significance of red in its endless shades throughout world history. Visitors to the exhibit will surely expect items of obvious connotations—perhaps a bull fighter’s cape, a show-stopping dress and a velvet curtain. Since the Textile Museum aims to collect threads of non-European origin, “RED” leads visitors to reevaluate their own cultural perceptions.

As primary color with no clear formula, red defies standards by its very nature. The most striking piece addressing this theme head-on is a self-portrait in tapestry by German artist, Thomas Cronenberg. In chronicling his own acceptance of his homosexuality, Cronenberg has created a shadowy portrait in black and red. The American-born contemporary artist wanted to confront the “erotic and vice” that many people might associate with the term “gay.”

Once an insult lobbed at suspected communists, red is forgotten in the digital language of CMYK (for cyan, magenta, yellow and black). But it was in the 2000 election that red was officially deemed to represent the G.O.P.—inciting a rivalry between red and blue states that now seems to have been around forever.

Before synthetic dyes, creating the color took more than a few clicks of the mouse. Also on display, a traditional Mexican woven dress from Oaxaca that was dyed with cochineals, small dye-producing bugs that live on cacti throughout Mexico. The dye extracted from the insects was the second biggest export to the New World before the invention of synthetic reds in the late 19th Century.

In a Peruvian tunic border garment, a Turkish velvet panel, a Navajo rug, a Berber shawl, a ball gown and an AIDS Awareness Ribbon, the cultural meanings of red are boldly displayed. Overall the exhibit is an intriguing commentary on concepts taken for granted in the very fabric of our culture.

“RED” is on view from February 2 through July 8. For more information, visit the museum’s website. The museum is also planning red-themed movie nights that will include showings of “The Red Violin” and the Krzysztof Kielowski-directed “Red.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate