Classically-Trained Hipsters

Having an affair? Vacuuming the house? Pop in Pink Martini’s <i>Hey Eugene!</i> and press play.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


If you really want to understand Pink Martini, clues abound in their choice of musical covers. I hesitate to use the word “covers,” because the compositions this Portland-based mini orchestra chooses to play, interpret, or pay homage to, are not mere songs. They’re orchestrated movements that conjure up images of celebration, romance, and sadness.

Formally-trained pianist and Harvard grad Thomas M. Lauderdale formed Pink Martini as a quintet in 1994 to play theme parties and fundraisers for causes such as affordable housing and public broadcasting. By 1998, the group had grown it into a 12-piece ensemble featuring vocalist China Forbes. Today, they perform with symphonies worldwide and headline venues such as Carnegie Hall. They’ve been dubbed “Portland’s international ambassador of culture.”

The songs they choose to cover or interpret provide a road map for of the group’s larger-than-life—and campy—foray into what could be called “classically-trained hip.” What makes the globe-trotting ensemble interesting is not just that they are relatively young and call the über-cool Northwest home. It’s not that they found a successful way to mix French café music and samba with Cuban rumba, Latin jazz, and cinematic, film noir music. It’s their ear for the rare; their eye for the obscure.

On their latest album, Hey Eugene!, the group continues to pluck songs from dusty record crates and use those songs to create something new. The CD includes “Tea for Two,” a soft, jazzy lullaby from the 1925 musical “No, No Nanette” that features jazz legend Jimmy Scott. “Dosvedanya Mio Bambino” combines Russian and Latin influences into a whopping, chanting climax with a reference to a World War II-era German song, “The Happy Wanderer.” Whether you want it to or not, the song’s marching chorus sticks with you for days.

The subdued “Taya Tan,” sung in Japanese, is a re-working of a Saori Yuki song about wanting to be a lover’s guitar. A sultry reworking of Abdel Halim Hafez’ “Bukra wba’do” is sung entirely in Arabic. “Tempo Perdido” is a 1934 Carmen Miranda samba that Pink Martini transforms into a danceable tear-jerker.

Hey Eugene!, with its rare covers and unique collaborations with musicians, is similar to the band’s previous efforts. 2004’s multilingual Hang on Little Tomato features the song “Una Notte a Napoli,” which was written with 1970s Italian stage and television actress Alba Clemente and DJ Johnny Dynell of the New York nightclub Jackie 60. 1997’s Sympathique, which featured a rendition of the popular 1956 Jay Livingston/Ray Evans song “Que Sera Sera,” received a Song of the Year nomination for the title track. That album also earned the group a “Best New Artist” nod at France’s Victoires de la Musique Awards. The album went platinum in France and gold in Canada, Switzerland, Greece, and Turkey.

Pink Martini has made an art form out of digging through the world’s forgotten music library, while simultaneously composing rich original works. Lauderdale explains it this way: “My hope is that we’re creating exquisite musical wallpaper which can be turned up or down, and played on almost any occasion, from background music to a love affair or vacuuming around the house.”

You get the feeling that Pink Martini prides itself in its high-brow splendor, as if they’re winking at you in between choruses and loving every cheeky minute of it. They probably are, but who cares? Their music—and their globetrotting—make for a damn good time. They are the first band in a long time to give the over-used term “world music” a good name.

Pink Martini is touring worldwide to promote Hey Eugene! this summer and fall.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate