August 5, 2008

Why Barack Obama Is Still Your New Bicycle

San Francisco writer and meme creator Mathew Honan explains BarackObamaIsYourNewBicycle.com, Twitter publicity, and what it’s like to have the Obama campaign favorite his photo on Flickr.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When BarackObamaIsYourNewBicycle.com went up on February 13, 2008, it wasn’t a big deal. The site’s author, San Francisco blogger and journalist Mathew Honan, publicized it only with a short snippet on his Twitter page. The design was Spartan: a white background with large-point, all-caps text describing imaginary, mundane good deeds performed by the Democratic presidential candidate. For example: “Barack Obama left a comment on your blog”; “Barack Obama helped you move a sofa.”

A day after the site launched, the site got play on Technorati.com, trickling upward to Andrew Sullivan, the The Economist, and Time, bringing in thousands of visitors. The site seemed to resonate with people, or at least amuse them. Within 48 hours, imitators had sprung up, among them JohnMcCainIsYourJalopy.com (“John McCain thinks you need a haircut, hippie”) and HillaryClintonIsYourNewBicycle.com. Now that Obamamania is in full swing (what with the tide of “Obamacons” and books on Obamanomics), it’s not completely surprising that Honan has a book deal from Gotham Books for a little paperback based on his site. It debuts August 5. (Note: Honan is a former Mother Jones intern and contributor.)

Mother Jones: What was the genesis of the site?

Mathew Honan: My wife Harper and I are both avid cyclists. Harper is absolutely consumed with cycling; it’s what she talks about all the time. Just before Super Tuesday she just went full-bore Obama. It was all she could focus on. She was canvassing, making phone calls, spent all Super Tuesday standing outside with Obama signs around town. So I said to her, “Barack Obama is your new bicycle.” She thought it was funny; I thought it was funny. And then on February 13, I was going home from the library on the bus and I started thinking how Barack Obama is kind of like the whole country’s new bicycle. I had the idea for the site around 5 p.m., and it was live by around 9 p.m.

MJ: Which of the imitator sites is your favorite?

MH: The first one to go up was RonPaulIsYourNewBicycle.com, and that’s still my favorite. [Sample entry: “Ron Paul is pretty sure the guy across the street is CIA.”] It was kind of the most clever; it had something to say. Later on there was HillaryClintonIsYourNewBicycle.com and then SteveJobsIsYourNewBicycle.com and after that I just stopped keeping track. The backlash sites started after that. It just went completely viral.

MJ: Why do you think it’s been so popular?

MH: I think to some extent it is kind of an empty vessel. I’ve had people convinced it’s an anti-Obama site. I’ve had people convinced it’s a pro-Obama site. And I didn’t intend it as either of those things. I was just trying to comment on the fervor there is for Obama and the excitement that he has generated in his supporters. I think it was popular because people who didn’t necessarily support Obama found it funny.

MJ: So you have all these things about Barack on the site, that he saved his dessert for you, he set your voice as his ringtone. But what do you really like about Obama?

MH: The two things I like best about him are that first, he is electable, which is important to me in a way it didn’t used to be. I’m 35 and he’s the first person where I believe in the candidate and I believe in his ability to make it to the White House. Second, I do get the sense that he’s someone who can begin to bring the country together more so than we’ve seen in the past 16 years. The past two administrations have been progressively more polarizing, and it’s fundamentally bad when our society has two tribes in opposition, and when you have someone ostensibly leading the country who 49 percent of the country hates.

MJ: Have you had any response from Obama?

 

MH: Some of his bloggers put it on his campaign blog and put links to it. But I haven’t heard a peep from [campaign people], and I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Though, Barack Obama has a Flickr site, and one of the things I put on the site was “Barack Obama favorited your photo,” and he did favorite my photo on Flickr. Or someone from his campaign did. So that was kind of neat. I don’t think they mind it.

If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate