Film Review: Critical Condition

Roger Weisberg’s forthcoming PBS documentary about 4 of the 47 million people in America without health insurance feels like <i>Sicko</i>, only sadder.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The deepest heartbreak in Critical Condition, Roger Weisberg’s misery vérité about 4 of America’s 47 million uninsured, isn’t the diabetic’s premature foot amputation or the cancer patient’s delayed chemo treatment.

It’s this quotidian conversation between a husband and wife about money, after the doctor leaves the room:

Husband: “I don’t want to live like this…I got 50-60,000 dollars in doctor bills.”
Wife: “You need to stop worrying about those collection agencies and medical bills.”
Husband: “Well I’m dying anyway!”

The documentary, which airs on PBS September 30, gathers a time-lapsed year’s worth of such wrenching doctor’s office and dinner table talks into one dark, pungent bouquet. All four of the US citizens profiled work in the service industry—or did, until their lack of employer health insurance caught up with them—and their stories are as depressing as they come. The cancer patient who couldn’t afford chemo? She turns off her phone to avoid collection agency calls about her unpaid prescription drug bills. Carlos Benitez, a chef whose pregnant wife prays for a milagro to heal her husband’s twisted spine? He finds one at a UCLA medical-student health fair after almost bleeding to death from an ulcer on the way to work. (Benitez’s expensive operation finally happens only because of a sympathetic doctor who frankly admits, “We do ration care in this country, based on ability to pay,” then begs on camera for a national solution to the health care crisis.)

While the film doesn’t offer solutions, it does raise several turnkey questions about preventative care, like, Who pays for the half-million patients currently battling cancer without insurance? And if an uninsured cancer patient could afford the 14 daily pills required to keep him out of the ER, or the tests that would have caught his illness earlier, how much money would the insured save on his annual costs? Stitched between the lapel-grabbing hospital scenes are statistics that fortify these already desperate questions. Perhaps the next president will find less desperate answers.

Find out what happened next to the four individuals profiled in Critical Condition here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate