June 16, 2011

George Jetson’s 9-Hour Workweek

And more dreams and nightmares of the future of work.


As long as people have labored, they have dreamed of the day when they might be free of work. With the advent of new, labor- and time-saving technologies, that day has often appeared to be just around the corner. From Karl Marx to Kurt Vonnegut, here are a few modern predictions and fantasies about what our lives might be like in a world where we work less.

In 1857, the father of communism envisioned a day when wealth would be untethered from work and we’d see “the general reduction of the necessary labor of society to a minimum”—freeing up time for pursuits such as art, science, and furthering world proletarian revolution. Photo: International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam

LOOKING BACKWARD: 2000 TO 1887
In this late 19th century bestseller, a man wakes up in a 20th century America where government and corporations have merged and everyone is forced to join the “industrial army.” On the bright side, they get to retire at 45.

R.U.R. (ROSSUM’S UNIVERSAL ROBOTS)
Karel Capek’s 1921 play is best known for popularizing the word “robot.” Plot: An inventor makes a workforce of “artificial people” that are compliant at first but then kill all humans except one, who is asked to reveal the secret of reproduction.

Photo: Library of Congress

JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES
Contemplating the end of the Depression and a coming era of “economic bliss” (PDF) where all material wants will be satisfied without full-time labor, the economist posits that people will still desire to work at least three hours a day.

Photo: International Monetary Fund

MODERN TIMES
In Charlie Chaplin’s 1936 comedy, the Little Tramp is mauled by a machine that force-feeds factory workers while they remain at the assembly line.

Photo: Getty Images/Hulton Archives

PLAYER PIANO
In his 1952 debut novel, Kurt Vonnegut imagines a not-so-distant dystopia in which machines do virtually all work, leaving Americans (except techies) with depressingly inexhaustible amounts of free time.

THE JETSONS
Meet George Jetson! The animated father of 2062 works just nine hours a week.

Photo: Warner Bros/Hanana Barbera

MANNA
In this 2003 sci-fi story by Marshall Brain, middle managers are replaced by an artificial-intelligence system that nags service workers to work faster, and fires shirkers. Those low-wage workers are then replaced by robots.

Photo: Lawrence Whittemore/Flickr

THE 4-HOUR WORKWEEK
Timothy Ferriss’ 2007 bestselling self-help book appealed to slackers and stress cases by showing “how to outsource your life” while having more money and free time. He assures readers, “My journey from grossly overworked and severely underpaid office worker to member of the NR [New Rich] is…simple to duplicate.”

Photo: davemc500hats/Flickr

 

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate