How to Make a Feature Film With Your Cellphone

The Oscar-eligible “Olive” is the first theater-ready film to be shot entirely with a smartphone. Here’s how it was done.

Lights, phone, action!Golnaz Shahmirzadi

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In early 2010, Hooman Khalili hatched his plan to make a theater-ready feature film using a cellphone simply because he could. “Technology is moving so fast I knew it could be done,” he says. He found a phone that shot in true high-definition, the Nokia N8, and knew he had a shot at producing a pixelated-free big-screen experience. When his pleas for backing from Nokia went unanswered, Khalili got the cash he needed for a serious production from former Facebook bigwig Chris Kelly and San Francisco businessman Bill O’Keeffe. By year’s end, Olive, a film featuring two-time Oscar nominee Gena Rowlands was born.

So, can anyone with a smartphone become a filmmaker? Maybe, but Khalili and his co-director Patrick Gilles had to go all-out MacGyver on the pocketable communication device to make it camera-ready. Consider the hack:

  1. Buy a Nokia N8 off Amazon—the only camera to shoot in true hi-def in late 2010 (yes, including the iPhone)—from Japan (the phone wasn’t available in the US): $379
  2. Ask for a “badass cellphone hacker” on Facebook to nix the phone’s autofocus feature (“The camera thinks it knows what to focus on,” says Khalili, “but it doesn’t.”) and its autozoom, which degrades the pixels: $150
  3. Post an ad on Craigslist seeking a 35mm lens (dropped/cracked, thus the bargain price of…): $800
  4. To jury-rig the lens for depth of field, commandeer pagers off of eBay for their vibrating mechanisms ($3.99 for 2), and ground glass: $20
  5. Each day before shooting (28 total days), Gilles spent an hour affixing the hacked phone to the hacked lens using three-quarter-inch double-sided tape (hardware-store standard issue, one roll). Oh, and he used “toothpicks and little pieces of paper to shim the camera on the fly and in the field.”
  6. Salvage a Hasselblad camera for parts to mount a prism onto an articulating arm as an eyepiece. Why? Because the camera shoots upside down and you want to watch footage without having to do a headstand.
  7. Film the entire movie on two SD cards: $40 each. (The N8 has a built-in SD card slot.)
  8. Since cellphones always run out of juice at the most inopportune times, use a portable battery (the size of a gift box) to make sure your camera doesn’t die during 10-12 hour days of shooting.

All told, $425,000 for hack, cast, and crew yielded a sharply shot film; it only looks amateur during fast-action moments, which are few given that the plot follows a young girl (Olive, of course) who charms her way into the lives of three lonely suburbanites, all without saying a word. The flick features a hauntingly lyrical song “Imaginary Friend,” by Ben Lear (son of Norman) and an eclectic mix of lilting tracks assembled by Khalili and his music supervisor Brooke Wentz. “I work in radio,” says Khalili of his day job, “and I have this theory that the best music in the world is the music you don’t hear on the radio.” So the indie music in Olive won’t sound familiar, which, well, thank god.

Olive is not the greatest movie you’ll ever see. The story is nice enough and there are several strong characters—but the real draw is the technique. The cinematography highlights stunning landscapes and vivid colors, striking scenes that at times upstage the narrative. “I was just trying to be groundbreaking,” says Khalili of his effort to create a made-by-phone movie that could be shown in theaters. He sees Olive as “the ultimate independent film” born of the smartphone age: “Two first-time directors; the queen of independent cinema, Gena Rowlands; no studio or distributor supporting it; and one movie theater in the entire country playing it. There’s no more of an underdog story than this.”

Earlier this month, hoping for a nomination for original song or supporting actress for Rowlands (“She’s due,” he says), Khalili mailed the film to all 6,500 of the Academy’s members. Whether Olive gets a nod, well, that’s now their call.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate