“The Avengers”: A Cripplingly Powerful Nerdgasm

You might have some trouble walking and need a cigarette once the end credits roll.

Photo courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Marvel’s The Avengers
Walt Disney Pictures
142 minutes

Dear comic book fans,

Take the frothy, industrial-strength nerdgasm you experienced the first time you watched Iron Man. Or the volcanic nerd-max you achieved on opening night of Thor. Or the patriotic nerd-OOOOOO-MG you embarrassingly sang out when you saw Captain America: The First Avenger in theaters.

Now double it.

That’s what you get with Marvel’s The Avengers, a rousing shot of popcorn flash, smooth wit, and accessible comic-book reverence.

For the past few summers, Marvel Studios has been pumping out adaptation after adaptation of the venerated Marvel Worldwide canon. The Avengers is the Traveling Wilburys of Marvel’s superhero sagas—an ambitious, loud epic in which you get to see the all-stars, from Hawkeye to Black Widow, band together to defend the planet from high-powered space fascists.

The action kicks off when angry Norse god Loki (played by British actor Tom Hiddleston) teleports his way to North America in his quest to impose totalitarian rule on all humankind—”I am burdened with glorious purpose,” he pronounces menacingly. It’s hard to take this wannabe galaxy dictator seriously at first, mainly because he talks like Masterpiece Theatre and looks like a 30 Seconds to Mars music video. But he starts mass-murdering people with his vast arsenal of space powers, so the guy kind of demands attention. Thus enter the Avengers, a ragtag team assembled by S.H.I.E.L.D. director Nick Fury (snake-punching virtuoso Samuel L. Jackson), to counter the onslaught. Here’s a refresher on the crew:

  • Tony Stark, a.k.a. Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.): The Randian badboy industrialist who takes a cavalier approach to flying around in a hot-red suit of armor, and neutralizing Islamists.
  • Bruce Banner, a.k.a. the Hulk (Mark Ruffalo): He uncontrollably turns green and causes billions of dollars worth in property damage. (Yes, Mark Ruffalo had to wear a leotard for his role.)
  • Natasha Romanoff, a.k.a. Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson): Master interrogator and kung-fu ass-kicker. She used to work for the Russians, now plays for team America. She somehow manages to wear high-heels even in the roughest instances of Avenger-ing.
  • Clint Barton, a.k.a. Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner): Supposedly the world’s greatest archer. Much like Black Widow, he has his fair share of covert ops/CIA malfeasance related skeletons in his closet.
  • Steve Rogers, a.k.a. Captain America (Chris Evans): A war hero who was injected with a performance-enhancing serum. He drop-kicked Nazis professionally back in the early ’40s.
  • Thor, a.k.a. Thor (Chris Hemsworth): A benevolent Norse thunder-god. He wields a scary magic hammer. Also, he’s the brother of space-Hitler Loki. This makes things awkward.

Throughout its ample running time, The Avengers stays afloat by wearing its affection for its characters proudly on its sleeve. The film takes long, explosion-free stretches of time to carefully establish a multitude of character profiles. Their unique motivations and insecurities are addressed with sympathy, enthusiasm, and—most crucially—humor. For this, credit is entirely due to the writing and directorial chops of Joss Whedon, the pop-cult icon behind Firefly and Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog. Whedon’s willingness to regularly emphasize dialogue and sentiment over spectacle and adrenaline demonstrates the impressive range of talent that his rabid fans have been hyping up for the past 15 years.

None of this is to say that the movie plays as a two-and-a-half-hour behavioral therapy session for the Hulk; the set pieces—particularly the climactic sequence that turns downtown Manhattan into a scorched-earth battleground—are tightly choreographed, dizzying displays of cinematic 3-D blowout.

The Avengers certainly does elevate itself well above the novelty of simply overloading one movie with a diverse cast of famous superheroes. But it is reassuring to know that the most memorable moments come from Whedon and Co. giddily milking the novelty element for all it’s worth. You finally get to see the Hulk fight Thor on a hovering battleship. Iron Man and Captain America tag-team killing henchmen and gigantic pagan monsters. You get to watch Samuel L. Jackson with an eye patch point his gun and shout things like, “Sir! Please put DOWN the spear!”

It’s terribly good fun and, all told, not a bad way to launch the summer movie season.

On a final note: In the film’s closing montage, there’s a clip in which one of New York’s Democratic senators squawks to reporters about the unaccountability and vigilantism of the Avengers. “We need them to answer for what they’ve done,” the wet-blanket-throwing legislator insists, foreshadowing the regulatory pushback that will likely crop up in sequels. This quick dig at American liberalism won’t surprise anyone following the Marvel Cinematic Universe. For example, the Iron Man movies—easily the best of the recent string of Marvel Comics adaptations—double as bona fide odes to conservatism. In Iron Man 2, Tony Stark gleefully mocks a panel of lawmakers and brags that he “successfully privatized world peace.” In the DVD commentary of Iron Man, Marvel frontman Stan Lee discusses why he created the character in the first place: to piss off some hippies:

It was the height of the Cold War. The readers—the young readers—if there was one thing they hated it was war, it was the military, or, as Eisenhower called it, the military-industrial complex. So I got a hero who represented that to the hundredth degree. He was a weapons manufacturer. He was providing weapons for the army. He was rich. He was an industrialist. But he was good-looking guy and he was courageous…I thought it would be fun to take the kind of character that nobody would like—that none of our readers would like—and shove him down their throats and make them like him.

And with The Avengers, it is undeniably smirk-inducing to see the Marvel franchise continuing to blow token kisses at the right.

The Avengers gets a wide release on Friday, May 4. The film is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action throughout, and a mild drug reference. Click here for local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate