“Snow White and the Huntsman”: Bella Swan & Thor Do Battle With Æon Flux

For a movie full of wily, axe-wielding dwarves, it’s pretty freaking bland.

Mr. F, the vain, batshit medieval version.Photo courtesy of <a href="http://www.snowwhiteandthehuntsman.com/">Universal Pictures</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Snow White and the Huntsman
Universal Pictures
127 minutes

If you’re in the mood to see Thor and a teenage fang-banger team up with wily, axe-wielding dwarves in an effort to overthrow Æon Flux (a.k.a., Mr. F from Arrested Development), then this movie is practically crying out to your cinematic sensibilities. Otherwise, you should consider passing.

Snow White and the Huntsman—the latest non-Julia-Roberts-career-killing adaptation of the Brothers Grimm fable—starts off the way most old-fangled yarns from the 19th century do: blood-soaked usurpation.

Snow White’s dad—newly minted widower King Magnus—meets Ravenna (played by an electric Charlize Theron). The king is so spellbound by her unparalleled bustiness that he forgets all about his dead wife and marries Ravenna literally within 24 hours of meeting her. Alas, the king’s horniness backfires: Ravenna Basic Instincts him on their wedding night, initiates a hostile takeover of the fiefdom, and indefinitely detains Snow White. The new queen deploys medieval storm troopers all across the kingdom’s districts, and begins repressing and mutilating minority populations. She also makes preserving her hotness the No. 1 political priority of the nation, wretched masses be damned.

Basically, Ravenna is Courtney Stodden, if Courtney Stodden had a British accent and paramilitary death squads.

Flash forward a few years into Ravenna’s reign: Poverty and disease are rampant, hope is moribund, and Ravenna’s goons keep on keepin’ on with the extrajudicial killing. On the bright side, though, Snow White (played by K. Stew) is all grown up and ready to mount a campaign of insurgency. She breaks out of jail and bolts into the unforgiving wilderness, thus prompting Ravenna to send Eric the Huntsman (no relation) to track her down. Eric (played by Chris Hemsworth—naturally) soon finds out that she’s the daughter of the dead beloved monarch and joins her in fomenting the glorious coup. He also coaches her on how to most effectively murder things:

“Look into their eyes, and do not pull it out until you see their soul,” Eric advises while teaching her how to stab regime troops with sharp objects.

When you hear that line, you immediately think that shit is about to get real. And shit does indeed get real—for roughly four minutes. The final battle scene when Snow White goes mano-a-mano with Queen Ravenna is a tightly executed, exciting showdown. Other than that, the crucial set pieces drag like a spout of narcolepsy.

The same could be said for the rest of the movie.

The film’s intentions are certainly appreciated: It’s always worthwhile to try to resuscitate a fairy tale using grit and gloom. And the film couldn’t be clearer about its feminist edge if it starred Maggie Gyllenhaal as a socialist. Whether Snow White is scaring off a Wrath of the Titans-esque creature with the power of yelling, or riding into battle on a noble white steed, it’s obvious that this young woman requires a wheelbarrow to cart around her humongous balls. But it’s tough to fully absorb the message when its obscured by so much limp action and even limper storytelling.

The epic battles—swords, arrows, balls of fire, chain mail, etc.—generally have all the choreography and pow of Final Fantasy gameplay—a disappointment from skilled commercial whiz and first-time feature director Ruper Sanders. The visceral shortfall, however, takes a back seat to the by-the-numbers dialogue, flat tone, and paper-thin characters. Just when you think the film is building up Ravenna as a tragic figure and sympathetic arch-villain, the issue gets dropped as if character development were a grave nuissance. The rugged contingent of pro-Snow White dwarves (played by misused talents including Bob Hoskins, Ian McShane, Ray Winstone, and Toby Jones) are way more irritating than charming. And Ravenna’s sycophantic brother Finn (Sam Spruell)—whose haircut and pigmentation make him look like an Aryan Toadette—is a one-man crash course in disposable, flavorless supporting roles.

The lackluster characterization and development strangle the suspense and anticipation out of the main narrative thrust. So by the time the movie gets around to hinting at a fierce love triangle involving Snow White, her childhood crush, and the Huntsman, there’s little to no reason to care about that tension coming to full bloom in the inevitable sequel.

There is one upside: the performances—particularly Theron’s convincing, icy portrayal of lunatic vanity—are all-around solid. And the film also serves as a helpful reminder to those who keep forgetting that (when she’s not saddled to the Twilight saga) Kristen Stewart is an impressive young actress. In The Runaways, Into the Wild, Adventureland, and now this clunker, Stewart has proven herself to be a commanding lead and an adept physical performer who can easily outstrip the reputation of a dud franchise.

Let’s hope she does the same with this one.

Snow White and the Huntsman gets a wide release on Friday, June 1. The film is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, and brief sensuality. Click here to get local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV features from Mother Jones. To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate