Lidia Yuknavitch Flicks Off Freud

An irreverent remake of a renowned case, the new novel “Dora: a Headcase” delivers a gritty take on girlhood.

Photo by Andy Mingo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It might seem a bit out of character for Lidia Yuknavitch to find inspiration in a kiddie cartoon. Best known for her 2011 memoir, The Chronology of Water, the 49-year-old author and English professor is revered for her raw, revelatory approach to tough themes—sex, desire, addiction, and abuse. She’s been featured in sex writing anthologies, kicked it with badass writers (Ken Kesey, Kathy Acker, and Cheryl Strayed, to name a few) and even pole-danced (recreationally). Yet some years ago, while watching Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer with her toddler, it was in this innocent, animated character that Yuknavitch found the key to a book idea she’d been incubating for decades.

Back in college, Yuknavitch and her classmates were asked to read Sigmund Freud’s 1905 case study of “Dora.” The report follows an 18-year-old girl in 19th century Vienna. She’s romantically inclined towards both men and women. She’s been fending off sexual advances from a family friend for years—and manifests the trauma through spates of muteness and coughing fits. The famed shrink deems Dora “neurotic” and “hysterical.” “It just blew my mind that not everyone in the room was filled with rage reading this,” Yuknavitch remembers. The advent of cartoon Dora, who is Latina, “was total destiny!” she adds. “She was both a really popular cartoon in mainstream America—and an outsider figure at the same time.” In other words—a Dora whose differences don’t make her any less socially acceptable.

Ida, the 17-year-old heroine of Yuknavitch’s new novel, Dora: A Headcase (out yesterday), is based on Freud’s Dora. When Ida’s father sends her off to therapy with Dr. Freud (“Siggy,” or “the Sig,” in Ida-speak), she brings along a vinyl Dora the Explorer purse she’s had since childhood but has remade to match her loud, raunchy adolescence: Dora now has safety pin eyes, a blow-up doll’s blood-red lips, and a tiny gun—and her blue monkey sidekick is “a death skeleton.” Inside the purse, Ida keeps a Zoom H4N audio recorder, which she uses to tape everything—her therapy sessions, restaurant rendezvous, everyday sounds—for later tinkering on her gadgets. And gadgets she has many, and she introduces each one with an obsessively detailed explanation of its function.Courtesy of Hawthorne BooksCourtesy of Hawthorne Books

The tricked-out purse is just one of Ida’s rebel antics: There’s the time she strips naked in the middle of Nordstrom (she calls it “Nordfucks”); her snarky pushback to Siggy’s diagnoses (“You really do have the synaptic wizardry, Herr Doktor, that’s for damn sure.”); or the time she gleefully shaves her head with her dad’s razor. She’s at war with the conventional girl script—not unlike Yuknavitch herself.

“I want to create new girl myths,” she says of Dora. “Instead of always talking about how women struggle in the face of certain models, what if we spent more energy highlighting all these great other possible girl-paths, and turned away from the dominant culture?”

It’s not just alt-girlhood that Yuknavitch is defending: Ida’s dearest friends are a black trans woman, a bulimic girl, a wheelchair-bound teen, a Native American rape victim, and a gay boy named Little Teena—a marginalized crew intended to critique how society deals with difference. “We point at someone and say ‘sick’ and point at another person and say ‘healthy’ in ways that are hypocritical and disgusting to me,” Yuknavitch told me. “I am trying to attack that.”

Some reviewers are calling Dora: a Headcase the female Fight Club, maybe because both tales take on alternative therapies and multiple identities. Or maybe it’s simply because Yuknavitch’s pal, Fight Club author Chuck Palahniuk, wrote the intro. Even so, she worries about the book’s reception: “Girl anger is really easily misinterpreted,” she says, “but I’d rather there be a novel out there with a girl voice like this, and have the book bomb, than to not write that kind of voice and act like it shouldn’t be in literature.”


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate