The Outlandish Sounds of Kishi Bashi

Picture Andrew Bird on Adderall in the desert with nothing but a violin, trying to find his way home.

<a href="http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/images/promo/hires/kishibashi/promo_kishibashi1.jpg">Joyful Noise Recordings

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It’s hard to put into words what, exactly, Kaoru Ishibashi does on stage. He’s a solo violinist, sure. But he’s also a singer, beatboxer, composer, percussionist and sound effect machine—all at the same time. It’s tempting to compare Ishibashi—a.k.a. “Kishi Bashi”—to that other looper extraordinaire, Andrew Bird, but that’s not really accurate. Kishi Bashi is what would happen if Bird overdosed on Adderall, was left in the Sahari desert with nothing but a violin, and had to find his way home, naked.

In short: Where the hell did this guy come from? 

Kishi Bashi isn’t one of those skinny jeans-wearing kids who breeze to the cover of Pitchfork when they’re 21. I first saw him years ago, back when he was part of Jupiter One, the kind of inoffensive Indie rock band Brooklyn churns out in droves. During a set at the Iota Club in Washington, DC, Kishi picked up his violin maybe a handful of times, but it was near impossible to hear over the drumkit. The band went on hiatus after failing to hit the big time, and Kishi went on to work with Regina Spektor and superstar weirdos Of Montreal. And the rest is history.

I spoke with Kishi at Austin City Limits music festival about his one-man show, why his album is not called “I Lost My Wrestling Match To Davey Pierce On The Big Black Bus,” and how he’ll write you a ukulele song if you send him $100.

Mother Jones: What made you decide to strike out on your own?

Kishi Bashi: I kind of got burned out being in a band from New York City, which is really incredibly difficult. After doing that for two years, I started touring with other artists. I worked on one of Of Montreal’s albums, doing string work and production and weird sounds for them, and that’s how I became friends with founder Kevin Barnes. I convinced him to let me join the band, then toured with them a year in a half.

MJ: How do you make such crazy sounds all by yourself?

KB: I have a delay pedal, and then I run through an octave pedal that creats a lower octave, or a  cello-like sound. And then I have a loop station, where I can do half-speed and double-speed loops. I’m slowly integrating other performers—at this show I have an awesome banjo player with me who’s a friend from the band Tall Tall Trees. But a lot of people like to see me do the show by myself, so I don’t think I’ll ever need, say, a full drum kit.

MJ: Wikipedia claims you’re putting out an EP this year called, “I Lost My Wrestling Match To Davey Pierce On The Big Black Bus.” Is that true?

KB: No. Kevin Barnes bombed my Wikipedia page. And I won, by the way. Anyways, I’m not doing an EP, but I am planning to release a series of acoustic songs I wrote as part of my Kickstarter campaign. I promised to write a 30-second song for everyone who gave me $100, and I have about 20 so far. They have ukuleles and stuff!

MJ: How much of your show is improvised on the spot?

KB: A lot of it is precomposed because it just takes a lot of practice. But I like to improvise, so I leave sections open. It’s about half and half. Every show people see of mine is going to be a little different by nature, because anything can happen with these pedals. Sometimes I forget to do something, or add something, and the beat just disappears. But that’s one thing I learned from Of Montreal—they’re totally committed to surprising their audience, and having these super provocative, wild shows that make the audience go: “What?” If you’re a performer and people are paying money to see you, you should at least surprise them.

 Click here for more music coverage from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate