Power Down Your Smartphones—the Magazine is About to Begin

The hottest ticket in San Francisco turns publishing into performance art.

Steven Leckart's pregnancy suit.Wendy MacNaughton

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It was in late 2008, with the economy in free fall and magazine publishers ever more desperate for a digital strategy to save their asses, that San Francisco-based journalist Douglas McGray had his aha moment. A former editor at Foreign Policy who’d turned free agent to write features for outlets like The New Yorker and the New York Times Magazine, he had recently begun to branch into radio, producing occasional segments for This American Life. It suddenly occurred to him that he knew tons of writers, but very few radio people or filmmakers or photographers. “I just thought it was weird,” McGray, a soft-spoken 37-year-old, told me recently. “We’re supposed to be in this multimedia age, and the professions are still fairly separate.” And then came his epiphany: What might it be like, he wondered, if you reimagined a magazine as a stage performance?

That idea, fleshed out with collaborators Derek Fagerstrom, Maili Holiman, Evan Ratliff, and Lauren Smith “at two or three kitchen tables and a couple of bars and coffee shops,” culminated in Pop-Up Magazine, a live event whose first “issue” was held in a 350-seat San Francisco theater. “We thought it was a ludicrously huge space,” McGray recalls. But they filled it. And Pop-Up (whose nonprofit accounting is handled by MoJo‘s parent foundation) is now the hottest ticket in town—Issue No. 7 (which happens tonight) sold out the 2,740-seat Davies Symphony Hall in about half an hour. But it’s not necessarily a showcase for rock stars. “There are people who are well-known literary performers,” McGray says. “They’re actors, really. They’re pros. We wanted to create a format where you didn’t have to be like that.”

Everything’s live: music, interviews, recipes, and even the ads—which tend to involve cocktails.

You never quite know what you’ll get. (The lineup is a closely guarded secret.) It might be Wired contributor Steven Leckart displaying a strap-on pregnancy suit that gives men a taste of their expectant wives’ burden. Or the director of Toy Story 3 showing how he grafted snippets from a dozen Tom Hanks vocal takes into a brief, heartfelt speech by Woody. In one issue, filmmaker Charlotte Buchen did a moving piece on a Pakistani pop star turned devout Muslim, and Times Magazine contributor Jon Mooallem, a regular, recounted a politician’s attempt to bring commercial hippopotamus farming to America in the early 1900s. In another, author Laurel Braitman profiled an obsessive squirrel fancier who later became a student of Sigmund Freud. Everything’s live: music, interviews, recipes, even ads—which tend to involve cocktails. “It occurred to me,” McGray says, “that you could put really phenomenal filmmakers who were just filmmakers alongside writers who were just writers alongside photographers who were just photographers.”

The shows are unrehearsed (no fiascoes yet), everyone gets paid, and, blessedly, Pop-Up remains that rare had-to-be-there experience—no photos, iPhone videos, or live tweeting, please. “We thought, ‘Well, let’s just make the show for the people in the room,'” McGray explains. “It was nice to just ask people to unplug for a couple hours. A friend of mine was sitting in the balcony and he said it was maybe the only time he’d ever been to a live thing where he’d look down in the audience and he couldn’t see a single glowing screen.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate