Channeling Dead Rock Stars With Ian Svenonius

As an author, the former frontman for The Nation of Ulysses and The Make-Up tests his supernatural strategies.


 
The Nations of Ulysses, way back when. By Don Lewis

At some book readings, authors serve gluten-free cookies and talk about their kids. Ian Svenonius, former frontman of the iconic DC-based bands The Nation of Ulysses and The Make-Up, channels the ghosts of dead rock stars. Here at Politics & Prose, an indie bookstore in the nation’s capital, he’s donned a Wiccan-esque robe that still doesn’t manage to contain his signature unruly black locks. Technically, Svenonius is here to talk about his new book, “Supernatural Strategies for Making a Rock ‘n’ Roll Group,” but I can’t remember attending a reading where the author held a séance and then told me to burn his book in an back alley bonfire after purchasing a copy. (Although one could imagine Chuck Palahniuk doing something like that.)

“This book creates everything one needs to create a rock and roll group,” Svenonius explains. “If you care about worker’s rights, you should work to suppress it.” He tells the crowd that he was inspired by a 1979 instructional manual for 7th graders interested in starting rock bands, which included useful information like, “Don’t stand in front of the PA.” Svenonius says that his book is an update that “doesn’t contain any useful information.” 

So if you want to start your own mega-successful band, here’s some advice from Svenonius—which he claims came from his conversations with reincarnations of dead rockstars, or living musicians in an internet chat room. Don’t ask.

Six steps to a successful rock band.

Channeling Paul McCartney: It certainly helps to be British…The American middle class, obsessed with the “brain gap” against the Soviets, shunned rock and roll as primitive gurgles, akin to smutty magazines… But when British groups—particularly the Beatles—reintroduced this filth to Americas as something which was exciting fun and fascinating, it created mass hysteria.

Channeling Little Richard: One should appeal to the sensibilities of the very young in order to avoid the cynical posturing of the teenage and adult years. The very young are like dogs on the street, when confronted by something that threatens them, they react by growling or crying. You can appeal to children by being a scary adult. Children are fascinated by horror, strange facial hair, grimacing, shouting, costumes, and dressing up like a walrus.

Channeling the Stones’ Brian Jones: The only way to make a solid, enduring myth is to create a moment or a thing which is frozen—the fly in amber effect… Death is the most surefire method of attaining a state of “perfection.” Faking one’s death is an obvious route, [or] one must explode the group at the apex of its career.

Channeling Jim Morrison: The most important thing is your record cover. This object is what gives records their aura of meaning, and because they seem meaningful, groups became meaningful. After the Internet was devised by the military industrial complex to destroy this phenomenon, groups have been robbed of their identity and reduced to a few squeals leaking from an iPod.

Channeling Willie Mae Thornton (who first recorded “Hound Dog” back in 1952): In a country alientated from national feeling such as the USA, where individualist, capitalist ideology strongly dissuades identification with the group and instead encourages sociopathic selfishness…subcultural bonding is a radical act. Without rock ‘n’ roll, it is virtually impossible.

Finally, if you’re wondering, as one audience member did, whether Svenonius would have done anything different with his own bands after writing this book (he’s currently involved with a band called Chain and the Gang), he gives a cryptic answer: “Oh God, no. No, I mean because—yes, I don’t. Yeah, but you know, it’s just one of those things.” 


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate