Comics About Feminism’s Big “Buts”

“The Big Feminist But” collects comics that explore and critique the meaning of 21st-century feminism.


Cartoon by MariNaomi

“Feminist, adj” by MariNaomi

For their new comics anthology, The Big Feminist But: Comics about Women, Men and the IFs, ANDs & BUTs of Feminism, editors Shannon O’Leary and Joan Reilly enlisted a group of artists and writers ranging from their mid-20s to mid-40s to submit comics dealing with their ideas, experiences, and impressions of feminism. The artists’ ages place them as having come of age during or after the “Third Wave” of feminism that emerged in the ’90s. Accordingly, the book’s title refers to the often-heard phrases “I’m a feminist, BUT…” and “I’m not a feminist, BUT…” and the resulting work utilizes a range of forms to both explore and critique traditional feminist themes and even question the idea of doing a feminist comics anthology now.

No one theme or approach dominates here. There are first-person explorations of some fairly classic issues done in ways that attempt to defy certainty: In “Boy’s Life,” Bitch magazine cofounder Andi Zeisler says, “I definitely don’t have any illusions about raising the perfect feminist son. I’m not sure what that would even look like,” while the accompanying drawing wryly undercuts her message by depicting her son asking his enthralled mom, “Can I learn to bake?” Many of the artists appear to be looking for ways to address traditional feminist topics and gender roles without being subsumed by them. “Queer, Eh?” by Virginia Paine, is about a young woman who’s looking for a word to describe her sexuality, and is delighted to find that “non-identifying” is indeed “a thing.” And in “Prostitution: for Teens” by Jen Wang, the main character explores the ramifications of writing a non-judgmental young adult novel whose heroes are teenage prostitutes.

Men make up 13 of the 41 listed contributors. In Mark Pritchard and Liz Baillie‘s “Must Respect Women’s Power, No Experience Necessary,” a guy interviewing for a job as an assistant in a women’s self-defense class gets a lecture on male entitlement as part of the interview. He ends up loving the job, which involves getting beat up while wearing a padded suit. Stories about nerdy boys and gay guys dressing as superheroes seem intended to parallel women’s efforts to break out of conformity.

And then there are the strips that go meta, examining the very idea of doing an anthology of women’s comics. “Manifestation” imagines how artist Gabrielle Bell ended up drawing a comic about Valerie Solanas’ infamous “SCUM Manifesto.” “The Labyrinth” by Andrice Arp and Jesse Reklaw includes this exchange between a chicken and a donkey:

Donkey: I guess it’s ironic and fourth-wall-bustin’ to critique a feminist anthology within itself.

Chicken: I know, but this one seems to be a whole different thing. Women and men talking about feminism, to me, is much more interesting then just throwing a bunch of women together and assuming that the result will be a feminist statement.

“The Dead of Night” by Dylan Williams

As the editors point out, the second thing that connects these varied contributions is the comics form itself, or “sequential art,” as Will Eisner called it. It’s not the point of the anthology, of course; but as a comics fan, I enjoyed the range of contemporary approaches to comics that this book pulls together. “My Horrible Heroines,” an exploration of one woman’s obsession with self-destructive heroines, is drawn by Shannon K. Garrity in a wide-eyed Manga-influenced style. Particularly breathtaking is the late Dylan Williams‘ “The Dead of Night,” where people in an office building after-hours are presented in a striking noir-ish style. A cleaning lady walks by men chatting at the end of their workday; her isolation is represented by their word balloons being cropped halfway out of the panels as she walks past, head down.

Excerpts from the comics in The Big Feminist But:

“Boy’s Life” by Andi Zeisler
 

“Queer, Eh?” by Virginia Paine
 

“Prostitutes: For Teens” by Jen Wang

 

“Must Respect Women’s Power, No Experience Necessary” story by Mark Pritchard, art by Liz Baillie
 

“How to Make a Man out of Tin Foil” by Barry Deutch
 

“Manifestation” by Gabrielle Bell
 

“The Labyrinth” by Andrice Arp and Jesse Reklaw
 

“My Horrible Heroines” by Shaenon K. Garrity
 

“The Dead of Night” by Dylan Williams


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate