Contact: The Charmed Life of Songwriter Jill Sobule

The imaginative musician on invented characters and her secret love affair with her parents’ LPs.


Jill Sobule at Cowgirl Restaurant. Jacob Blickenstaff

Jill Sobule distinguishes herself from declarative and confessional songwriting by creating musical worlds inhabited by invented characters, often depicted with wry humor and satire. Coupled with a nuanced and educated pop vocabulary—equal parts Beatles, Beach Boys, and Burt Bacharach—she creates the sonic backdrop for her characters with inventive arrangements. She can also rip a mean guitar solo.

On her new album, Dottie’s Charms, Sobule furthers her fictional approach by teaming up with roster of writers including Jonathan Lethem, Luc Sante, David Hadju, and Mary Joe Salterto. Using a charm bracelet found by a friend on eBay, presumably owned by one Dorothy, each writer wrote lyrics inspired by an individual charm (a Canadian penny, a horse stirrup, an office chair, a Statue of Liberty, etc.). Sobule then arranged music to match. The result is a sonically diverse yet surprisingly cohesive portrait of an imagined Dottie, and a sweet and sad life reanimated by trivial tokens.

Jacob Blickenstaff photographed and talked with Sobule at Cowgirl, her old haunt in the Manhattan’s West Village. The following is in her words…

I was a weird kid. Instead of going home to play with friends I would just listen to music from my Close’N Play [record player]. It was either that or, I remember during fourth grade I would just want to watch Watergate coverage.

I had a brother six years older than me so I wasn’t just listening to teenybopper stuff. My brother had the cooler music but my parents had the Burt Bacharach, Tom Jones, the Association, the Fifth Dimension; these groups were un-cool but I secretly loved them. Whereas my friends might listen to the songs, I would spend hours looking at the liner notes and figuring out who did what and listen to the productions. I don’t think other kids would listen and think “Oh, that’s an interesting bass sound.” Whenever I was sick at home my dad would bring me a vinyl record. I remember getting David Bowie’s Station to Station when I had the flu.

You can never get over what you listen to for the very first time, that probably comes out in my music. The new record for instance, there is nostalgia in a charm bracelet. The lyrics on “My Chair” feel Mad Men, so my mind goes to “It’s Not Unusual” [Tom Jones], or Petula Clark. With Sam Lipsyte’s “I Hate Horses,” I’m thinking maybe a Marty Robbins kind of feel. I don’t want to emulate the music but I have these references some girls my age didn’t have.

I like being a storyteller. I’m bored with myself; I like to write about others. I have a lot of names in my songs: Karen, Margaret, Mary Kay. Even if it’s about me I want to put it through someone else. The music is the soundtrack to the story.

With Dottie’s Charms, this is the first time I didn’t write any of the lyrics. I didn’t do a lot of editing, but not everyone had a song form to begin with. Sometimes I would repeat a phrase to create a chorus. The song “Flight” [Vendela Vida] was really wordy. I didn’t want to cut things out so I mostly talked the words for the verse. The album was like a jigsaw puzzle, but what was amazing is how similar the writers’ vision of Dottie was. Her love life has not been great. They all gave her a tough time.

People get to a certain age and success that they stop being curious. I’m still curious because I haven’t really had that success. I’ve never done a record to catch whatever the latest sound is. It’s my love of music, eclectic-ness, and the music that I heard my entire life that seeps in. That’s what you’re hearing.

Film for “O Canada” (Canadian Penny Charm)
(Footage by Sara Zandieh; lyrics by Sara Marcus; music by Jill Sobule and Mike Viola. To listen to the entire album, read the lyrics, see illustrations of Dottie, and watch more films, see this special feature from Harper’s.)

“Contact” is an occasional series of artist profiles by Jacob Blickenstaff.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate