The Worst Segments That Appeared on Cable News in 2014

Or, the year in Don Lemon.

In 2014, it was hard to escape the overwhelming sense that the world was falling apart. Between Ebola, ISIS, Ferguson, Ukraine, and lost airliners, doom-and-gloom news ruled the year. For cable news, however, bad news is good news—and big business. The good folks at FOX News and CNN solemnly took on the mission to inform a scared, confused public hoping to make sense of it all. Let’s look back on their best moments:
 

Ferguson

CNN anchors Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo were on the ground in Ferguson, Missouri, following the grand jury’s decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson. Lemon notably reported some crucial details, such as the “obvious” smell of marijuana among protesters:

Moments after that, a canister of tear gas was sent in their direction, presumably by the police. While the network’s coverage up to this point wasn’t exactly smart, it’s worth noting that what followed was pretty remarkable:

Bill O’Reilly and guest Bernie Goldberg, fuming from the FOX studios, were determined not to be outdone. If you can make it through the first ten seconds, watch this piping-hot take develop on Ferguson residents protesting in order to steal “cell phones and liquor”:

ISIS

FOX News was responsible for some truly stellar coverage on the rise of ISIS. Aside from garden-variety fear-mongering, FOX stepped into the ISIS versus ISIL debate with an interesting theory—that Obama was using the term “ISIL” as a sign of respect to the terrorist group:

Megyn Kelly sparred with a representative from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who argued that it was wrong to conclude all Muslims are extremist because of ISIS. Kelly was not receptive to this idea:

CNN, not content to let FOX have all the wildly irresponsible fun of generalizing an entire religion, had scholar Reza Aslan on to discuss religion and violence. Aslan got a little heated, which Chris Cuomo basically used as evidence that Islam is inherently extreme. This earnest echo chamber begins around 1:15 (right after a spirited investigation of a “sperm bank mix-up”):

Ebola

At the height of the Ebola hysteria, CNN earnestly asked the question: is Ebola the “ISIS of biological agents?” It was a genius convergence of news cycles. Perhaps it was too genius. It took an NYU doctor about a minute to debunk the notion:

For FOX News’ Gretchen Carlson, the conspiracy was deeper, wider, more sinister. In this segment, she called into question the government’s response to Ebola, because… Benghazi/IRS/Obamacare:

Catcalling

While most of the media reacted to a viral catcalling video with concern, FOX stepped in to ask the real question: what was all the fuss about?

Bob Beckel used his influential soapbox for a noble purpose: to catcall the woman in the video, again. At around 3:05:

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

What exactly happened to MH370 will likely remain a mystery for a very long time. With no clear answer and few concrete details in this tragedy, CNN was left to fill in the blanks. First, Don Lemon—with the helpful aid of some props—took us through some likely possibilities:

Then, as answers appeared harder to come by, Lemon and some CNN guests wondered if something else happened to the plane—something spooky. Just try not to get the chills here:

Even deeper into the crisis, the network—worn down by hundreds of hours of MH370 coverage—appeared to just totally lose it. Under the guise of a “your questions answered” segment, Lemon asks: would it be all that crazy to think the plane got swallowed by a black hole?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate