Charleston Paper Investigating Church Shooting May Have Been Attacked by Hackers

The Post and Courier’s website was taken down Friday morning after a possible web attack.

A screenshot of the Post and Courier's website on Friday.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Charleston’s Pulitzer Prize-winning daily newspaper, the Post and Courier, is investigating the possibility of a “denial of service” attack that shut down its news website for long stretches Friday morning, in the wake of Wednesday night’s massacre at the city’s Emanuel AME church.

“We’re exploring whether it was an infrastructure issue, or whether it was a concerted attack, a DDoS attack,” Mitch Pugh, the newspaper’s executive editor, told Mother Jones Friday morning. Pugh is referring to a “distributed denial-of-service” attack, which renders a website useless by overwhelming its servers with automated requests for information. “It’s starting to look like someone tried to take our site down,” he said, though he warned it’s still too early to say for sure, despite “early indications.”

The Post and Courier first posted about the outage at about 7 a.m. Friday morning, via Twitter. But problems persisted. The website was inaccessible for “20 to 30 minutes at a time, sporadically,” across the morning, Pugh said. The companies responsible for hosting the website, he noted, are “telling us that they are seeing activity on their end that would indicate a DDoS attack.”

The site’s outage comes amid the newspaper’s second major international story in as many months, after the death of Walter Scott in North Charleston in April. The outlet has been aggressively covering the Charleston church massacre since Wednesday night, producing up-to-the-minute coverage on its website by throwing between a half and a third of its newsroom (of about 80 people) at the story, Pugh says. Covering such an intense story has been emotionally and physically draining for everyone: “We’re trying to get people more into a shift mode and get some mental health breaks, and some downtime to get some rest,” he said.

“A lot of our folks know people who were either in the church or close to people in the church,” he added. “So it’s certainly an emotional, difficult time for everybody.”

Pugh said the newspaper was working with its hosting companies—NewsCycle Solutions and Savvis—to get to the bottom of why the website went offline. In the meantime, the website appears to be back in business:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate