The Woman Who Created “Transparent” Wants You to “Borrow White Male Privilege”

Jill Soloway dishes on season 2 of the year’s most critically acclaimed show.


Maarten De Boer/Getty Images

FOR TV WRITER and director Jill Soloway, making good television was never enough. “I used to go on pitch meetings and say, ‘I want to write something that’s never been written before, something that’s going to change the world,'” she said at a recent panel. After attracting attention with zany theater experiments, the Chicago-born writer was plucked to work on shows like HBO’s Six Feet Under and Showtime’s United States of Tara.

But her breakthrough arrived when Amazon bought her series, Transparent. Equal parts comedy and melancholy drama, the show follows the three Pfefferman children, who are stumbling to find their truest selves as their father (played by Jeffrey Tambor) transitions into a woman named Maura. Transparent’s much anticipated second season will premiere in December to a more trans-aware culture, one that has largely embraced Caitlyn Jenner and witnessed the hiring of the White House’s first transgender employee. Soloway, 50, deserves some props for this momentum. In 2015, Transparent took home two Golden Globes and five Emmys, including one for directing. But for Soloway, whose own father, or “moppa,” came out as transgender at the age of 75, “to feel like it’s for a larger cause is the most exciting part of all of this.”

Mother Jones: Where can we expect to see Maura along her transition in season two?

Jill Soloway: She’s past the “who knows?” and the “who doesn’t know?”—the coming-out drama—and now she’s on more of an identity journey: becoming herself and making decisions on her own, her body, and getting into the journey of love and sex.

MJ: Maura’s self-absorbed children seem to have a hard time with adulthood.

JS: Because their childhoods were plagued by this giant secret, they haven’t had a chance to be themselves. Everybody is feeling around in the dark, trying to figure out what the secret is and trying to understand what is real. It’s like living in a carnival fun house.

MJ: What are the challenges in developing a transgender protagonist?

JS: I want to make sure that Maura’s stories are generated and deeply felt from a place of her own desire. Because I’m not trans, I’ve brought in a lot of trans consultants, and we have trans producers. This year, we have [our first] trans woman writer, Our Lady J.

“Some trans folks will say, ‘This is a great story line,’ and others will say, ‘This is offensive.'”

MJ: Your trans-affirmative hiring policy has led to degendered bathrooms on set and about 80 transgender crew and cast members. When you consult with them, do big debates ever arise about how to depict Maura?

JS: I wouldn’t say big debates. There’s not only one way to represent the trans experience. Some trans folks will say, “This is a great story line,” and others will say, “This is offensive.” We’re always open, and we’re lucky to have so many trans people involved.

MJ: How do you see the show’s role, given this historic year?

JS: The folks who have been living as trans people are the generators of this movement. We’re just part of the tsunami. I happen to be a family member of a trans person. I felt ready to catalyze this personal information into entertainment, so I’m happy to be part of this revolution, but it would be too much to claim any responsibility for it.

MJ: Obstacles still exist, like efforts to police where people can use the bathroom. Do you see this changing?

JS: Yeah, I actually do. There are some simple solutions. If you go to Europe, public bathrooms have any-gender sink areas and stalls for everyone to use. This is completely reasonable. It potentially involves the destruction of the urinal industry, which I think people would be happy to see go away.

MJ: Do you think Caitlyn Jenner’s story has helped the cause?

JS: I think it’s great. There are a whole bunch of people—Republicans or sports fans or reality TV fans—who probably would never have recognized that they have trans people in their world. Caitlyn Jenner really is thinking about the movement and saving lives, so I know that her intentions are honorable.

“I think kids are much more capable of understanding the idea of being transgender than adults.”

MJ: Do your kids watch Transparent? Does it stoke their curiosity about gender?

JS: Well, I have one kid who’s in college, so he’s pretty caught up. And then I have a six-year-old who has been on the same journey as the rest of us, learning about a grandparent’s transition. I think kids in general are much more capable of understanding the idea of being transgender than adults.

MJ: What about your parents—how have they reacted to the show?

JS: Both of my parents have visited the set. And my moppa and Jeffrey Tambor have met, and moppa’s really quite thrilled.

MJ: You’ve described Hollywood’s sexism as a “state of emergency.” What advice could you give to female filmmakers and actresses to help fix this?

JS: Along the way, female filmmakers will have the feeling that they’re not good enough. And that’s really just a result of being “otherized” from the moment they’re born. Keep an eye out for all those insecurities, and even expect them. Borrow white male privilege and just move through the world as if it was created for you. You have to kind of talk yourself into an imaginary space where the world is on your side and expects you to speak and wants you to speak. You have to create that space for yourself over and over again. Every hour sometimes.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate