In a Galaxy Far, Far Away From Comic Book Bigotry, Black and Queer Heroes Rule

Amid a backlash against Star Wars’ black protagonist, one artist is creating universes that reflect the real world.

<a href=https://www.flickr.com/photos/xavierwilkinson/14665394675/in/photolist-okVYUk-hcTE9V-fqwPnh-57kHCn-zohfj-dRY9Xc-bBeqaD-eficEY-rF1nEY-4VFTzH-psj14c-9AS5Wf-wnsgMx-oamNnS-bojvSL-6HGtXE-bBepZZ-bojwj3-bBeqCF-bBeqsx-bM7fJM-zobKW-apMVgc-bpFLge-p78CdM-p78Cg2-p79xqs-p79xwj-poBc2A-p78WFE-poCMKV-poBbJm-q7445B-oqrx9d-7vCAKm-eciZh5-pYcbRZ-5RXrsC-oYvDq5-mLgJTz-qsWSzi-fyCxU5-cfHLSd-ePxCAe-mDE7qm-uXhiD9-qSJqty-qrni1D-fejDH5-akKbdH>Joshua Livingston</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In October, a small but dedicated internet faction urged people to boycott the new Star Wars movie. On Twitter, #BoycottStarWarsVII became a trending topic, with some people tweeting that George Lucas’ latest promoted “white genocide,” because the lead role is played by John Boyega, a black man—and because we see our first black Stormtrooper.

Racially charged outbursts from fans of science fiction and comics are hardly new. In the ’40s and ’50s, comics “were sexist, they were racist, you name it,” artist Jules Feiffer told Mother Jones last year, “and they kind of gloried in that.” In 2011, critics including Glenn Beck cried foul when Marvel Comics made Miles Morales, a black-Puerto Rican kid, one of several spin-off Spider-Men in alternate universes. The controversy escalated earlier this year, when Marvel designated Morales as the principal Spider-Man. A Sony Pictures licensing agreement, leaked via the big studio hack, revealed specifications that Parker be played by a straight, white, male actor. Marvel creator Stan Lee reinforced this idea in a June interview when he said Parker should remain straight and white. Some fans were incensed by a Twitter campaign to cast actor/rapper Donald Glover as Parker; the role ultimately went to Andrew Garfield, who is white.

None of this has gone unnoticed by Brian K. Vaughan, an artist best known for his popular Saga series, not to mention his work on Runaways, the award-winning Y: The Last Man, and classics such as X-Men, Batman, and the Swamp Thing. In his own books, Vaughan, who is white, has made a concerted effort to feature people of color and queer protagonists. Saga is the story of an interstellar political conflict with an interracial family at its center. His most recent work is Barrier, a bilingual graphic novel that tackles immigration politics and includes entire scenes in Spanish. I caught up with Vaughan, the recipient of 10 Eisner Awards, to talk about comic trolls and his refreshing approach to the medium.

Mother Jones: Why do you suppose people who are willing to indulge fantastical worlds full of web-slingers and Jedis are so protective of those worlds when it comes to race?

Brian Vaughan: I don’t know, and I find it very unpleasant. I think some people are just very passionate that things remain the way they were when they were kids. Whether that means Spider-Man has organic webshooters versus mechanical webshooters, or he’s black or he’s white—they just love everything to be the way it used to be. I’ve never had any interest in retelling stories from my youth.

MJ: Is that why you choose to create main characters who are black women, say, or queer ghosts?

BV: [Laughs.] I like things that are weirdly imaginative and couldn’t be real, but I also like stories that are recognizable and relatable. With Saga, when I started, that wasn’t in the forefront of my mind. But I was talking with [illustrator] Fiona Staples, and I said, “There are these two characters, one has horns and one has wings.” Her first question was, “Well, do they have to be white?” I realized that for fantasy and science fiction, especially from my youth, white was the default. Luke Skywalker was in the lead, or even if you were a hobbit, you’re going to be white. That was an extremely old-fashioned, obviously really narrow-minded way to look at things. We don’t have to tell another sci-fi epic with two boring white people at the lead—let’s make them people of color. I think the book has been much better for it.

MJ: What made you want to write about immigration?

BV: Immigration confuses and terrifies me, so why not try to write a comic and make some sense of it? Marcos Martin [his co-writer on Barrier] and I had just finished doing the story of The Private Eye for Panel Syndicate. We wanted to try our hand at digital comics, in part because comics used to be this really inexpensive medium. Over the years, it’s become this really expensive hobby for just a few people. Privacy is one of the most important topics of the last five years, and it was really fun to be able to put out this comic and have it released in Russia the same day it was released in the United States and France, and sort of have this dialog begin. We wanted to tackle another big subject, and immigration will be just as important in the next five years, especially with the election coming up.

MJ: Do you get any backlash or hate email from the trolls over the inclusivity of your lead characters?

BV: I’ve never gotten anything but support and thanks from people for having diverse books. People just want good stories. But I can’t imagine how hard it must be if I was a person of color to see that kind of outrage on Twitter. I’d like to believe that humanity is, for the most part, pretty good, and I think that these are just a handful of angry weirdoes. I hope I’m right. Let me say this: To try and imagine that I’m another person is always going to be hard—whether I’m writing about a truck driver or someone who is gay, who’s trans, who is of a different ethnicity or creed. But it would be boring if I always had to write about myself and my limited viewpoint.

MJ: How did you choose to do some parts of Barrier only in English, and some only in Spanish?

BV: I’ve been fortunate enough to travel to comic conventions in Portugal, France, Canada, and it’s an honor to get to meet people from all over the world. But it’s also a reminder of what an “ugly American” I am, and how bad my language skills are, and the fact that I can only speak English. I see how much that separates and divides us. So yeah, this was a deliberate attempt to put out a book where we weren’t going to do any translations, where odds are, whether you speak English or Spanish or neither, you’re going to be lost at some point in this story. And that’s okay. We hope that by the end you’ll be able to understand what happened. It was the kind of thing we’d never be able to do as a TV show or a movie. You’d never be able to convince someone to give you money to do a bilingual story where you’re not translating half of it—you’d drive people crazy. But in comics, you can do whatever your heart desires.

Correction: An earlier version of this story referred to Morales as black-Dominican, not black-Puerto Rican.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate