With the national parks’ much-touted 100th anniversary winding down, we’ve seen a number of books, documentaries, articles, and even hands-on, parkwide science events, all celebrating the National Park Service. 

Among the books showcasing the park service, Picturing America’s National Parks, published by Aperture with the George Eastman Foundation, stands out for its examination of the role photography has played in the parks’ history. It includes luminaries, such as the earliest photos of Carelton E. Watkins and Ansel Adams’ park-defining images as well as more recent work by Lee Friedlander and Rebecca Norris Webb. This book shows how photography not only helped shaped the national park system, by encouraging tourists to visit, but also had a very real impact on the creation of it.

Throughout the parks’ 100-year history, photographs have helped draw visitors so they can experience the majesty of the parks themselves. As we all know, whether it is a photo of the Grand Canyon or Isle Royal, a picture is never as powerful as seeing these spectacular places in person.

William Henry Jackson’s early images of Yellowstone’s greatest features, such as Old Faithful and the Lower Falls, along with artist Thomas Moran’s classic painting The Grand Canyon of Yellowstone, brought the majesty of the West to leaders in Washington, DC. These images helped persuade Congress and President Ulysses S. Grant to name Yellowstone as the first national park in 1872.

Yo-wi-ye, or Nevada Falls, 1861. Albumen silver print. Carleton E. Watkins/George Eastman Museum, gift of Alden Scott Boyer.

The Three Brothers, Yosemite, 1911. Gum bichromate over platinum print. Alvin Langdon Coburn/George Eastman Museum, bequest of the photographer

Picturing America’s National Parks showcases a number of photographers whose work reflect trends in photography over the years. You have early, large-plate photography, sometimes hand-colored. There’s the technical perfectionism of Adams’, Edward Weston’s and Minor White’s images. The book also showcases more pedestrian photography, such as postcards and tourist images over the years of iconic park sights like the Old Faithful Geyser. As you see the clothing and photography styles evolve in the photos, these images give a fascinating look at how the landscape of the parks changed to accommodate swelling numbers of tourists.

Mirror Lake and Reflections, ca. 1872 Eadweard J. Muybridge/George Eastman Museum, museum accession by exchange

George Eastman at the Grand Canyon, July 12, 1930 Audley D. Stewart/George Eastman Museum, gift of University of Rochester

The book is arranged chronologically, thus when the ’50s and ’60s come into view, you have photographers like Garry Winogrand and Joel Sternfeld pulling back with a wider lens, focusing as much on the visitors as the landmarks they came to see. This trend culminates in Roger Minick’s excellent series Sightseers, which he shot in the 1980s, focusing specifically on tourists.

Running water, Roaring Fork Road, Gt. Smoky Mts., October 10, 1967  Eliot Porter/George Eastman Museum, gift of Murray Beckerman and Abraham Altus

As the book brings us to more modern times, we see more artistic takes on picturing the parks, such as Mark Klett and Byron Wolfe’s project Reconstructing the View, which incorporates historical images repurposed in recently photographed vistas. All in all, it’s a truly excellent survey of photography of the national parks, even if the work selected leans particularly heavy on the parks of the West, such as Yosemite, the Grand Canyon, and Yellowstone.

There’s so much more to the national parks.

Old Faithful geyser, Yellowstone National Park, August 1968 Unknown/George Eastman Museum, gift of Peter J. Cohen.

Woman on Head and Photographer with Camera; Unknown Dancer and Alvin Langdon Coburn at Grand View Point, 2009. From the series Reconstructing the View: Grand Canyon Photographs. Mark C. Klett and Byron Wolfe/George Eastman Museum, gift of the artists

Sunrise on Mesquite Flat Dunes, Death Valley, California, 2013 David Benjamin Sherry

Mountains + Valleys: Arches, Diptych, 2013 Millee Tibbs


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate