The Complete and Unbelievable Otis Redding

Is it possible to get too much of him? Not with these two fab collections.


Otis Redding
Live at the Whisky A Go Go: The Complete Recordings
Stax

 
Complete and Unbelievable…The Otis Redding Dictionary of Soul
Rhino

Concord Music Group

Is it possible to have too much Otis Redding? Not if you’re talking about these two terrific collections, both of which are as fresh and exciting as anything released today despite being a half-century old. Compiling seven complete sets from a red-hot Los Angeles weekend on six discs, Live at the Whisky A Go Go finds Redding poised to capture the attention of mainstream pop (i.e. white) fans after establishing himself as a soul-music star, strutting his stuff at a hipster venue best known as the haunt of acts like The Byrds and The Doors. Some of these great performances have been available before, but not in this unedited format.

No two sets are the same, and no two renditions of a song are the same—every time Redding stepped up to the mic, he seemed to be singing a song for the first time, mixing flashes of pure genius with the offhand verve of a gifted performer who knew that being himself was the key to success onstage.

Redding’s touring band wasn’t the peerless studio crew that featured Booker T and the MG’s and the Memphis Horns, but a rowdier, sloppier, two-fisted team that served as a perfect match for his freewheeling spontaneity, especially guitarist James Young and drummer Elbert Woodson. Many of his best-known songs are here in electrifying form, including “Respect,” “Security” and “Mr. Pitiful,” while multiple versions of “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction,” some running nearly nine minutes, could almost make you forget the Stones.

The final solo studio album released in his lifetime, Complete and Unbelievable…The Otis Redding Dictionary of Soul has been expanded into a two-disc edition that features the LP in mono and stereo plus eight bonus tracks. A couple of his greatest hits are here, namely the irresistible singalong “Fa-Fa-Fa-Fa-Fa (Sad Song)” and his stirring reboot of the standard “Try a Little Tenderness,” previously performed by Frank Sinatra, along with cuts that underscore Redding’s versatility. The latter include a take on the country standard “Tennessee Waltz” and the bluesy original “Hawg for You,” not to mention the poignant “You Left the Water Running,” which, unbelievably, went unreleased at the time. The players are peerless and Redding never sounded better. This Dictionary will never go out of date.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate