Here’s a Really Dope Funk Band That Happens to Be Asian American

“We are here to make music that breaks stereotypes.”

 

Trace Repeat is a six-piece soul and funk band based in Oakland, California. Listen to their music and find yourself lost in brassy chords, throaty vocals, and seductive lyrics reminiscent of Motown—a movement defined by African American icons like the Temptations and Stevie Wonder. But there’s something different about this band: Three of the six members are Asian American—an identity they have had to grapple with as they’ve gained recognition.

Wesley Woo, 28, and Zach Hing, 22—both of whom now play bass and guitar and sing in the group—first met in the spring of 2015. Woo, who majored in music at the University of California-Berkeley, was gearing up for South by Southwest with a different band; Hing was wrapping up his illustration major at California College of the Arts. At the festival, Woo realized that his music—”an indie rock band heavily based in singer-songwriter influences”—just wasn’t fit for Austin’s boisterous and chaotic festival scene, so when he got back to California, he asked Hing to collaborate on a more energetic band. They quickly settled on funk, drawing inspiration from Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder, and Michael Jackson. “The icons I grew up listening to were all black because there were no Asian American icons,” says Woo.

“The icons I grew up listening to were all black because there were no Asian-American icons.”

Over the next few months, they built the band that would become Trace Repeat—recording demos, playing gigs around the Bay Area, and gaining a small but respectable following. Then, in May 2016, they caught the attention of Lauren Lee, a scout from Kollaboration, a national nonprofit that promotes Asian American and Pacific Islander representation in entertainment and media. The group has launched the careers of stars like Kina Grannis and David Choi. “Lauren told us, ‘I’m really interested in investing in you guys because you aren’t doing the thing that all Asian American musicians do,'” says Woo, who describes the prevailing Asian American stereotype as “touchy-feely singer-songwriters who sing love songs and play on acoustic guitar.” In September, with a fresh new set of band members, Trace Repeat competed at Kollaboration’s annual talent showcase, as the San Francisco chapter’s finalists. It was their first major break on a national stage.

Woo points to that night as the moment when Trace Repeat first began to recognize and struggle with their Asian American identity. “For a very long time, it wasn’t really something that Zach or I addressed,” says Woo. “It just so happened that we were both Asian, and other Asians tended to flock toward us” and become fans of their music.

But as the band continued to gain momentum, they began to have racially charged encounters offstage. Once, a man asked Woo where he was really from. Other times, audience members made references to the incongruousness between funk’s sex appeal and the prevailing stereotype of the emasculated Asian male. Yet another time, Woo recalls, “someone after a show actually asked us, ‘So your bandleader—he’s not here tonight, right? There’s a white guy that’s supposed to be leading this band, right?'”

“I just want to be a band—a really dope-ass funk band.”

These experiences ultimately led Woo and Hing to focus on Asian American empowerment during their January Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign for their debut record. “When you’re a musician, you don’t really get to talk about many things that affect you as an Asian American because there’s never really an opportunity to do that,” says Woo.

On the flip side, however, Woo is also wary about pigeonholing the band. “Once you’re an Asian American band you can only play Asian American shows,” says Woo. “I just want to be a band—a really dope-ass funk band.” It’s a struggle common to many artists and creators of color, particularly Asian and Pacific Islander artists who face the lowest levels of media representation.

This month, Trace Repeat will be traveling to Austin—using the extra money they raised after their Indiegogo campaign blew past the initial goal of $5,000 to well over $8,000—to fulfill Woo’s original dream and perform at South by Southwest. When the band reflects on their success so far, Hing says, “We’re just really grateful that there’s a whole community out there, that people are actually paying attention to what we’re doing.”

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate