What the NFL Could Learn from Colin Kaepernick’s Reading List

Turns out, the former 49er has been engaging with some works from black feminists.

Colin Kaepernick

Erik Pendzich/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Football season is rapidly approaching and former San Francisco 49er Colin Kaepernick is still out of a job. Kaepernick, who made headlines last year with his refusal to stand for the National Anthem in protest of police brutality, has inspired a host of players—from Marshawn Lynch to various members of the Cleveland Browns to several of his old San Francisco teammates—to follow in his footsteps. But his stand is also almost certainly the reason he’s unemployed. The quarterback says he’s still working out daily in hopes of signing with a team, but, in the meantime, he’s not giving up on his activism—which, it seems, has been influenced by a legacy of black feminists. 

This week, Ameer Hasan Loggins, a PhD student at the University of California, Berkeley, published a column on The Athletic about his relationship with the former football star and what the public generally misunderstands about how he came into his politics. While still with the 49ers, Loggins met Kaepernick through the quarterback’s partner, New York City radio host and Cal alum Nessa Diab, and Kaepernick started auditing Loggins’ lectures at Berkeley on race and representation. “When I talk to my students about Colin, I always emphasize that when he audited my course, he (driving from San Jose to Berkeley) had his ass in class on time, everyday, taking notes, doing the readings and participating in class discussions,” Loggins writes.

Kaepernick and Loggins have also become friends, and Loggins has lectured across the country at Kaepernick’s day-long camps dubbed “Know Your Rights”—paid for entirely by Kaepernick—that bring black and brown youth together to learn financial planning, nutrition, team-building, and how to handle interactions with police. The camps so far have taken place in  Oakland, Harlem (where I attended one), and Chicago

One of the most interesting tidbits from Loggins’ piece is the reading list that he sent Kaepernick more than a year ago. There were the typical titles associated with black political thought, including Franz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth. Then, more surprisingly, there were a number of black feminist works more commonly associated with the emerging idea of “intersectionality” in contemporary black organizing, including Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment, by Patricia Hill Collins and Black Looks: Race and Representation, by bell hooks.

Both Collins and hooks are pioneering minds of black feminism, and their work has taken on renewed significance in recent years as a younger generation of black organizers associated with the Black Lives Matter National Network and #SayHerName have pushed back against the male-dominant tendencies of previous activist movements. The movement at large has based much of its activism around the idea that women’s labor is important, and often unrecognized. While these theoretical contributions aren’t directly linked to the activism that’s popped up in recent years, they’re definitely strong influences. The significance of this shift was articulated early on in the emergence of Black Lives Matter movement. For instance, back in 2014, Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza wrote for the Feminist Wire, “Straight men, unintentionally or intentionally, have taken the work of queer Black women and erased our contributions.” 

So, is Kaepernick an avowed black feminist? It’s not totally clear from Loggins’ column or Kaepernick’s statements. But the importance of just his engagement with black feminist work can’t be understated. Not too long ago, Kaepernick was one of the NFL’s most marketable players, with high-profile endorsements from the likes of Nike and Beats by Dre. His jersey is still among the league’s bestselling. Quarterback gig or no, Kaepernick is still one of the most well-known football players in the world—and he’s still breaking barriers in a league that is arguably one of the penultimate expressions of brute American masculinity.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate