Former Black Panther Plays an Uber-Driving Grandma in This Awesome New Comedy

“The North Pole” tackles gentrification and climate change—and still makes you laugh.

What do melting ice caps and North Oakland have in common? Extinction. That’s according to The North Pole, an ambitious new web comedy series about Bay Area gentrification that hits YouTube on September 12. Set in Oakland, the show, which takes its title from a nickname locals have given to one rapidly changing part of the city, takes a unique approach to this well-trod topic by pairing it with a broader discussion about the threat to so-called native species—people of color.

On its face, this is an odd pairing of topics, but it makes sense given the show’s origins. The series was produced by Movement Generation, an Oakland-based ecological justice organization. It was bankrolled in part by $25,000 in donations from a campaign that co-creator Josh Healey started on Kickstarter.

Healey, who has called Oakland home for a decade, and his fellow co-creators Darren Colston and director Yvan Iturriaga, had grown tired of hearing white people talk up environmental justice while ignoring the concerns of communities of color. The North Pole is their effort to bring those two conversations together. “I think the most effective form of communication is through stories where people can come up with their own meaning,” he told me over coffee one recent morning at Cafe Dejana, an Eritrean breakfast spot in North Oakland.

The creators’ ambitions are lofty and, for the most part, achieved. In seven episodes, each clocking in at just under 10 minutes, they manage to develop complex characters (roommates Nina, Marcus, Benny, and Fin), have fun with an assortment of Oaklandish lingo—”yaddadamean”—and follow through on an emotional storyline that doesn’t always go where you might expect. It’s also pretty damn funny. The series falls short when it tries too hard to get its social message across: A polar bear (who hates skim milk) shows up periodically to symbolize the extinction of another native species, and the random cameos prove more distracting than enlightening.

But the show earns back some street cred with appearances by an impressive list of East Bay personalities, including former Black Panther leader Ericka Huggins, Boots Riley (of the Coup), Mistah F.A.B., and comedian W. Kamau Bell.

Former Black Panther Ericka Huggins portrays an Uber-driving grandma.

The North Pole

It’s the core characters, though, that make The North Pole worth watching. There’s Marcus (Donte Clark), a techie from the ‘hood trying to find his place in the new Oakland landscape; Benny (Santiago Ross), a politicized stoner; and Finn (Eli Marienthal of American Pie 2 fame), the white-boy gentrifier who does his best to become an ally. Nina, played by Oakland-born actress Reyna Amaya, is the witty powerhouse that holds it all together, thanks in part to her ability to draw on her own experience.

“This is a movement, not just a series,” Amaya, who joined us for coffee, said between sips. “I’m hoping that people see this and see themselves, see their neighborhoods, see their homies.”

In one of the more meaningful scenes, Nina argues with her Uber-driving grandma, played by Huggins (the irony of a former Black Panther driving an Uber is hard to miss), about the legacy of 1960s black activism. Here Huggins plays a semblance of her real self, alluding to 5 a.m. wake-up calls during the Panthers’ free breakfast programs.

The Panthers must have been an abject failure, Nina argues, if the result is this new Oakland where young activists can no longer afford rent. “You need to have a vision, Nina,” Grandma says. “Folks can only walk somewhere new with you when they can see where you’re taking them.”

Free tickets for the September 7 series premiere at Oakland’s Grand Lake Theater, featuring a discussion with creators and cast, are available here. Also, a correction: Healey is employed by Movement Generation, not Kickstarter (as an earlier version of this post indicated).

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate