Ben Carson’s Controversial Confidant Wants to Buy Washington Newspaper

“Accepting [government] money to promote policies?” says one staffer. “That’s not a person who should own a newspaper.”

Armstrong Williams speaks at the annual DC Influencers Brunch at a downtown Washington restaurant in 2016.Sipa/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Armstrong Williams, the conservative businessman, TV talk-show host, and longtime confidant of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson, is trying to buy Washington City Paper, the alternative weekly newspaper covering the nation’s capital.

According to a current City Paper staffer, the paper’s editor, Alexa Mills, informed the staff on November 10 that Williams was interested in buying the publication. Later that morning, Williams and three associates arrived in the newsroom. “We learned he was coming in,” the staffer told Mother Jones, “and then he was suddenly there.” Williams went around the newsroom shaking hands with members of the editorial staff and asking about their journalism backgrounds.

The paper’s current owner, Nashville-based SouthComm, said in October that it had put City Paper up for sale. (SouthComm bought the paper in 2012.) City Paper was founded in 1981 and has a history of producing award-winning journalism and journalists. It has often covered important issues overlooked by larger media outlets in Washington. The paper’s owner has received interest from several potential buyers, but Williams is the first to meet the paper’s employees, the current staffer says.

If Williams succeeds in his effort, City Paper would be in the hands of an owner with a controversial past and a track record of blurring the lines between business, media, and politics. The 55-year-old Williams has faced allegations of sexual harassment and was embroiled in a scandal for promoting George W. Bush administration education policy on his radio program without disclosing that he had received payments from the government. More recently, Williams was accused of using television stations he owns to boost Carson’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Williams did not respond to a request for comment. City Paper editor Alexa Mills declined to discuss the sale. SouthComm Chief Financial Officer Bob Mahoney said in an email, “We do not comment about such matters,” adding, “All we will do is confirm the Washington City Paper, after many years of ownership by SouthComm, in a flagship city like Washington DC, is for sale.”

Williams has long been a fixture at the nexus of business, media, and Republican politics in Washington. He moved to the capital from his home state of South Carolina to intern for Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.), whose 24-hour protest of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 remains the longest filibuster in Senate history. Years later, Williams, who is African American, worked as an assistant to future Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas when Thomas chaired of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission during the Reagan administration. Since then, Williams has carved out a uniquely Beltway career as a Republican jack-of-all-trades: adviser to politicians, host of his own TV and radio shows, and businessman of many ventures.

In his wake, Williams has left a string of controversies and scandals. In the 2000s, Williams admitted that he had received more than $180,000 from Bush’s Department of Education to promote the No Child Left Behind Act on his radio show and in his syndicated column but had never revealed those payments. The Government Accountability Office investigated Williams’ contract with the Department of Education and found that the agency had violated a federal ban on “covert propaganda.” Williams admitted no wrongdoing but repaid $34,000 of his contract.

In 1997, Williams was sued by by a former producer of his radio show who alleged that Williams had kissed and fondled him repeatedly for nearly two years. Williams denied the allegations, and the case was later settled.

Last year, Williams was sued for sexual harassment and retaliation by Charlton Woodyard, a former sales employee at a Jos. A. Bank men’s clothing store in Washington’s Union Station. The suit alleged that Williams tried to “control Mr. Woodyard financially, professionally, and emotionally” and that Williams “abused his power to attempt to exploit [Woodyard] sexually.” According to Woodyard’s complaint, Williams once asked Woodyard to join him for workouts at a local gym:

While at the gym, Mr. Williams pressured Mr. Woodyard to accompany him into the men’s steam room after exercising. Mr. Woodyard agreed but kept a towel wrapped around himself. Mr. Williams generally removed his towel and sat naked, exposing himself to Mr. Woodyard. Mr. Williams also made frequent remarks to Mr. Woodyard while naked in the steam room, about Greek and Roman bath houses.

Williams denied the allegations. He told the Washington Post that Woodyard’s suit was financially motivated. In a subsequent court filing, Williams admitted making certain comments described in Woodyard’s suit but disputed “the context and characterization of the allegations as editorialized in the [complaint] and on that basis den[ied] them.” The case was settled confidentially late last year.

Williams and his scandals have long been fodder for City Paper reporters. In 1995, reporter David Plotz wrote a lengthy and biting profile of Williams, mocking his self-affixed nickname “Meteor Man” and detailing his role in the campaign countering the allegations that Thomas had sexually harassed Anita Hill. The paper covered the 1997 lawsuit in an 8,000-word piece by reporter John Cloud. The paper also reported on the 2016 lawsuit.

This September, the paper’s “Loose Lips” columnist published a lengthy interview with Williams, which included his thoughts on what “fake news” means:

“It’s when you don’t agree with the reporting, especially when it’s about you. Listen, most journalists work long and hard checking out sources to get the story right. I think most journalists have integrity. You can always have situations like with CNN. But I think for the most part, 80 percent of what’s printed is accurate.”

A longtime friend of Carson, Williams drew considerable attention for his role as an adviser to Carson’s failed bid for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. As Mother Jones recently reported, a former Carson campaign staffer recalled multiple instances when Williams used his business interests—he owns multiple TV stations in partnership with the pro-Trump Sinclair Broadcast Group—to boost the fortunes of the Carson campaign.

The current City Paper staffer says the details of Williams’ past weren’t widely known in the newsroom, but once staffers became more familiar with his history, “panic set in.” The staffer adds, “We knew he was a conservative TV host, and some people didn’t like that. Accepting [government] money to promote policies? That’s not a person who should own a newspaper.”

Aaron Wiener contributed reporting.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate