“Thor: Ragnarok” Is the Best “Guardians of the Galaxy” Film Yet

Poor Thor has lost his hammer and all hell breaks loose.

Courtesy of Marvel Studios

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Who is the least popular Marvel movie superhero? It’s complicated. If we’re going off the box office, the answer is Hulk. Edward Norton’s 2009 turn as Bruce Banner in The Incredible Hulk made far and away the least amount of money. 

Based on critical reception, though, Thor gives Hulk a run for his money. If the reviews for Thor’s inaugural outing in 2011 were “mixed,” the follow-ups were straight-out bad. 2013’s The Dark World has the lowest ratings of any MCU film on both Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. 

It’s a pleasant surprise, then, that Thor: Ragnarok, a film about those two characters, would prove to be the best Marvel film in years. 

We haven’t seen these guys in a while, since 2015’s Age of Ultron. A lot has happened since. Much of it memorable! (Captain America: Civil War, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 1) Some of it not. (Ant-Man, Guardians 2) But none of that really has anything to do with Thor or Hulk, who have been off doing their own things. 

This is the part where I am going to tell you about the plot of Ragnarok so feel free to skip it not because there are going to be spoilers, but because it is stupid and doesn’t really matter. Ready? Natalie Portman and Thor breakup, and Thor has a nightmare about his home planet of Asgard getting destroyed, so he goes around the universe to explore and finds this evil fire monster who is bad, and Thor defeats him and returns to his home planet to tell Anthony Hopkins that all is good and well, but it turns out Anthony Hopkins is actually his dead brother Loki, apparently undead, in disguise ruling the planet, so Thor and Loki go find the real Anthony Hopkins who Loki had banished to Earth, and they hang out with Dr Strange for a quick second and then find out their dearly beloved dad is dying but before pa’ kicks the can, he informs them that they have a secret sister and, boy, is she evil and she’s going to kill them. Then he dies. Then the sister appears. It’s Cate Blanchett. She says not nice things to them. And she breaks Thor’s hammer. Blah blah blah Cate Blanchett returns to Asgard and starts enslaving people while Thor and Loki end up lost on some sort of gladiator planet run by Jeff Goldblum. Hulk is there too and a New Zealander rock monster and stuff happens. 

It’s great!

Not because of what happens—I obviously can’t even really remember all the plot points—but because of how it happens. The problem with the Thor movies has always been that they were ridiculous but earnest, a problem not unlike the one that besets the Captain America franchise. But whereas Captain America films have made up for it with an action-adventure tone that made it work, Thor and Thor: The Dark World kind of just… existed. With Ragnarok, Thor has found a tone that works. Or more accurately, he’s borrowed one that fits. The influence of Guardians of the Galaxy on this film is profound. Not only is it a straight-out comedy with celestial hijinks but also like Guardians, Ragnarok plays with genre in a fun way. There is an 80s inspired thing going on in this movie that is really special.

What levity was in the earlier Thor films came from Thor’s fish-out-water ignorance of how humans work. The joke was on him. (Again, similar to the Captain America movies). But in Ragnarok it’s switched. He’s the relatable one in the movie. It’s Jeff Goldblum who’s gone mad! And Hulk! And Cate Blanchett! And the New Zealander rock monster! And everything else! It also helps that he doesn’t have his hammer. As nice as the hammer was, it made him too indestructible. Here he is almost mortal. Almost. He is still the God of Thunder, of course. *

Hulk too is really in his element here. In The Avengers & The Avengers 2: Avenge Me Like You Mean It, Bruce Banner is Tony Stark’s sidekick. In Ragnarok, Hulk is Thor’s sidekick. And it’s great! Look at that dumb green giant fight! But also we get to talk to the dumb green giant more than we ever have before because the dumb green giant has grown and evolved and is sort of funny now, too. 

And Cate Blanchett does a deliciously devious Cate Blanchett in the role of Very Powerful Villain Who Spends Most of the Movie Walking Around Giving Speeches. In the hands of a lesser actor, Thor’s sister would be a flat, predictable mess.  But hammy, scenery-gobbling Cate Blanchett gives it verve. Whenever she’s on screen, it’s a delight. 

All of this comes together to make Thor: Ragnarok the best Marvel movie in years. Sorry, Spider-Man.

Thor: Ragnarok opens in theater today.

Correction: An earlier version of this article called Thor the “God of Lightning.” He is the God of Thunder. We regret the error.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate