The Trump-Putin Meeting, According to Fox News

“You were very strong at the end of that press conference. You said, ‘Where are the servers?'”

The backlash to President Donald Trump’s astonishing press conference alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin has been overwhelmingly fierce and swift. “Nothing short of treasonous,” former CIA Director John Brennan said on Twitter. “Today’s press conference in Helsinki was one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory,” Sen. John McCain said in a blistering statement.

Even on Fox News, a handful of hosts and commentators offered rare criticisms of the president after he openly sided with Russia over his own intelligence community and law enforcement agencies. 

But any significance of Fox News personalities daring to speak out against Trump was easily eclipsed by loyal acolytes Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson, who each landed interviews with the president following his meeting with Putin. Unsurprisingly, Fox was the only network to be granted interviews.

Speaking with Trump in Helsinki shortly after the summit wrapped up, Hannity started his interview by lavishing praise on the president’s performance. “You were very strong at the end of that press conference,” Hannity said, referring to the portion of Monday’s press conference during which Trump invoked one of his favorite conspiracy theories against Hillary Clinton. “You said, ‘Where are the servers?'”

Trump nodded in agreement and repeated Putin’s denial of Russian interference. “They have no information on Trump,” he added.

Notably absent from Hannity’s questions was any mention of the nearly universal criticisms of Trump’s remarks. Instead he echoed Trump’s tweet leading up to Monday’s summit, predicting that “no matter how well I do at the Summit,” the media would go out of its way to find some way to criticize the meeting with Putin. “If I was given the great city of Moscow as retribution for all of the sins and evils committed by Russia over the years, I would return to criticism that it wasn’t good enough,” Trump had tweeted.

The interview continued with Trump and Hannity amplifying conspiracy theories about Peter Strzok, the FBI agent at the center of the Russia investigation, and the “13 angry Democrats” in the special counsel probe.

Tucker Carlson, whose interview with the president will air Tuesday evening, spent Monday with Stephen Cohen, an NYU professor of Russian studies and contributor to The Nation. Cohen characterized the shocked and negative reaction to Trump’s performance as “mob violence.” That segment aired with the news ticker “MEDIA IN MELTDOWN MODE AFTER PUTIN SUMMIT.”

“They seem to hate or resent the idea that Trump is president that they’ve lost all sense of national security,” Cohen said. Carlson further expanded this line of reasoning by accusing Democrat and Republican leaders of trying to seek increased conflict with Russia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvn0mIY2_NM

In another segment, Carlson did acknowledge there was foreign interference in US elections. He claimed that Mexico has interfered into US elections with more success than Russia. How? By “packing our electorate,” he announced. Stay tuned for even more obsequiousness tonight. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate