ThE sTaFf oF mOtHeR JoNeS iS vErY DiViDeD oVeR HeAdLiNe cApiTaLiZaTiOn aNd nEeDs YoUr HeLp

A bunch of head cases want your opinions on hed case.

Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Ten years ago, a plane carrying 155 people crash-landed safely on the Hudson River, piloted down by Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger. A week later, Barack Obama became the 44th president of the United States. It was also the year Rod Blagojevich was impeached as Illinois’ governor and Sarah Palin resigned as Alaska’s. Michael Jackson—missed, mourned, his legacy debated—danced away.

There’s a reason some events endure in national memory and others fade fast, if they register at all, including the most consequential news of 2009: On October 18, the Washington Post made a shattering announcement—it was changing its headline capitalization style from title case to sentence case.

The fuss has faded, but when the Post changed “Headlines Like This” to “Headlines like this,” a clash of conventions was laid bare in its pages. The main objection to the switch was distilled in the words of one reader who pleaded with the paper to reconsider: “Please capitalize the headlines. The new format suggests to me that we should not take the article too seriously.” Because title case, by virtue of convention, is Correct. It’s Serious. It’s Credible. It conveys Doing News. In the paper’s defense, then–executive editor Marcus Brauchli answered the reader: “The new approach to headlines—so-called down-style, or lower-case…is more readable and allows us to write slightly longer headlines. The old headline style, in which most words were capitalized, was formal and just isn’t as readable.”

The Post wasn’t alone in its support for sentence case. The Los Angeles Times agreed. The Boston Globe agreed. So did the Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Houston Chronicle, Philadelphia Inquirer, and other papers, all lured by the imperatives of digitization. Title case was now analog. Sentence case was the new standard—at those papers and, today, at ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, CNN, Vox, Salon, and TechCrunch, whose editor-in-chief in 2016 announced the sentence-case switch by calling it “a more colloquial headline composition” that avoids the “awkward acrobatics” of title case.

Those Awkward Acrobatics Are Hard to Conquer: Title case requires contortions of capitalization that apply to the first and last words in a headline, and all nouns, verbs, adverbs, and adjectives, but not articles or conjunctions, or prepositions of three or fewer letters, with the exception of idioms like “Break Up,” and the first word after a colon, and the first word after an em dash—and the word “But.” Got that?

Some publications get it. Title case is firmly favored by the New York Times, the New Yorker, Vice, Slate, Wired, the New Republic, and the Atlantic, even though they sometimes slip up. At Mother Jones, we never misapply title case. Ever. (Except when we do.)

Since joining Mother Jones in March, I’ve been reviewing our headlines and squinting at dozens of capitalization mistakes that I can’t unsee, an industry-wide phenomenon. It’s no reflection on individual sites; it’s a symptom of style evolution and platform confusion, and it’s the subject of a bitterly brawling feud (a style skirmish) between factions of true believers on Mother Jones staff. Which should prevail?

We put this question to staff in an internal survey conducted over five days this month, with secret ballots to reduce bias. At the final hour, sentence case had eked out a 37–34 lead:

Not everyone at Mother Jones voted, and nothing in the poll’s rules prohibited backdoor campaigning or outright electioneering. One colleague emailed an entire Mother Jones department with a last-minute plea to vote sentence case. The arguments for both sides went like this:

  • Title case is preferred because it’s familiar, formal, standard, and first. It distinguishes news from noise, and journalism from everything that isn’t. It authenticates and domesticates the wilds of the internet by marking the boundary between careful reporting and bloggy rants. It compels trust, earned or assumed. It has, in a word, gravitas. Presumably.
  • Sentence case doesn’t give a rat’s ass for gravitas. It locates real gravity in the reduction of error, the improvement of consistency and readability, and the gain of shareability across platforms. Sentence case is efficient, economical, colloquial, and industry-accepted. It’s easier to get right, and it doesn’t clutch to the conventions of 20th-century newsprint.

This minor debate, in many ways, is a metaphor for our moment: Media companies are divided over what credibility looks like, even at the level of style. This isn’t a test of headlines; it’s a test of a hypothesis: To preserve an institution, you sometimes have to change the institution, even if deviation is seen as capitulation.

But which case should prevail?

Ultimately, Mother Jones headlines are for our readers. Where do you stand: “Title Case” or “Sentence case”? Many factors will determine our final decision on headline style—not just straw polls—but your opinions will be part of the discussion. Weigh in below or reach us at styleguide@motherjones.com.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate