If It’s Not a Service Animal, Leave Your Pet at Home, You Monsters

Traveling for the holidays? Vet groups want you to stop exploiting the rules so you can fly with Fluffy.

Monsterajr_images/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

There are few things Americans love more than traveling home for the holidays. This Sunday is slated to the busiest day for US airlines in history, with 3.1 million people flying home that day (overall, airlines expected 31.6 million passengers over the course of Thanksgiving travels this year). But what do Americans love even more than holidays? Their pets, and going to extreme lengths to pamper Fido and Kitty.

In recent years there has been a growing cohort of people who, worried about what might happen to their pets locked in the cargo bay for a two-hour flight, have been exploiting loopholes meant to help disabled people, all so they can travel with their pets onboard flights without putting them in a crate. These are not “service animals,” a truly important class of animals that have been trained to help disabled individuals with specific needs, animals that follow specific government guidelines to comply with the American with Disabilities Act. No, these are “emotional support animals” that provide an unclear resource beyond just making someone feel better. These comfort animals are essentially just normal pets, and they often come with all the unruliness you’d expect of an untrained house animal: Biting, barking, pooping everywhere they go.

For individual businesses, it can be difficult to discern which animals offer real assistance, and which instances are just someone not wanting to leave their dog in the car. In an encouraging sign of humanity’s good nature, most people don’t want to question someone over their disability, so businesses will often avoid prying. In a discouraging sign against humanity, there are plenty of people out there willing to exploit those other nice people.

Back in 2014, Patricia Marx explained this disturbing trend in the New Yorker. “What a wonderful time it is for the scammer, the conniver, and the cheat,” she wrote. To highlight the absurd ways this has become the norm, Marx tested out how people reacted as she trotted around with various emotional support animals: a turtle, an alpaca, a turkey, among others. 

Last weekend, the New York Times had an article exploring how people have exploited the rules to such a large degree that veterans’ groups are coming out for changes to clarify the rules, since as false claims of support animals has led to increased difficulties for veterans who rely on their service animals for important, legitimate health needs:

“There needs to be standards to hold people accountable,” said Lori Stevens, the founder of Patriot Paws, which works with Texas prisoners to train service dogs for veterans.

One small dog bit a service dog that was lying under a seat at the gate, causing that dog to be spooked and taken out of commission for its veteran owner, she said. Other veterans have drawn unfriendly looks when they take their dogs into public places.

“We have someone who has had 21 brain surgeries, but if you look at him, you can’t see he has a mobile disability,” she said.

The Times noted that a large group of vet and disability organizations recently sent a letter to the Department of Transportation asking for new, stricter rules clarifying training for animals allowed on planes.

“What about the mental well-being of everyone else?” Marx noted in her New Yorker article. “One person’s emotional support can be another person’s emotional trauma.” I can certainly relate to that. I have decently severe flight anxiety, and like a sane human being I treat that by asking my doctor for a prescription for xanax, not by making life miserable for everyone else sitting on my plane. I’m also not much of an animal lover, so having your obnoxious, poorly trained dog drooling on me or running around the aisles isn’t exactly helping keep my panic attacks at bay.

If you absolutely must fly with your cat or dog for the holidays, just follow the airlines simple rules about carrying your pet in a crate, it really isn’t so hard.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate