Revolutionary Musicians Your Playlist Needs Right Now

Duke, Simone, Ellis, Grimes, and countless pioneers of sound, civil rights, and creative resistance.

Duke Ellington on tour in 1963Victor Drees/Evening Standard/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Welcome to Recharge, a weekly newsletter full of stories that will energize your inner hellraiser. See more editions and sign up here.

On a bright day 121 years ago today, in Washington, DC, two pioneering musicians named Daisy and James welcomed their son, Edward, into the world, and set in motion an artistic revolution embodied by the 3,000-plus compositions he created. Edward did more to transform the sound of American life, and the workings of bands, than anyone else in his time, but he wasn’t alone. Social distancing of another kind was in effect, but he pulled in space and time and galaxies of musicians and listeners, with a nickname supremely fit to his style.

For Duke Ellington’s birthday today, Healdsburg Jazz in California, overcoming the cancellation of its festival, adapted by throwing a Zoom listening party for hundreds of people on Sunday with live home performances, clips, and interactive walkthroughs of Duke’s life, hosted by bassist Marcus Shelby. “The deeper you dig, the more treasure you find,” Shelby said, capturing the vitality and range of a legend so canonized as a bandleader that it’s easy to overlook Duke’s first passion: piano. And his greatest strength: listening. “The most important thing I look for in a musician,” Duke once said, “is whether [the musician] knows how to listen.”

Healdsburg’s party continues with Staying Connected events and exclusive living-room recordings. There’s also a 24-hour Duke stream on WKCR today.

For Duke’s birthday, let me know which recharges you more, this original—recorded secretly and kept hidden for two decades before its release in the ’70s, when it won a Grammy—or this rendition by 28-year-old Aaron Diehl in 2013. Diehl was enamored by the ballad’s “impressionistic quality,” he tells me. “Just such a beautiful color palette, and that sense of space and serene line of melody.”

Listen below, and let me know at recharge@motherjones.com: Duke’s or Diehl’s?

Here are more Recharge stories to get you through the week:

Postcard to the future. Seventeen years ago today, one of the most defining and powerful essays ever written about Nina Simone—who’d died days earlier—appeared in the Village Voice, an essay as profound as its subject. The themes are all too familiar during today’s pandemic: stamina tested, distance felt, justice sometimes achieved, and “love not quite as hoped,” but love still. It was written by the interdisciplinary artist and historian Thulani Davis, who hears Simone in a constellation of civil rights and artistic giants including Alice Walker, James Baldwin, and Toni Cade Bambara. Two decades later, Simone’s sound continues to enlighten and educate, as does Davis, a widely admired professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, on Twitter @temne. Here’s that piece, and the sound:

Take three. If you’re hearing a theme, it’s because jazz is a sound of resilience: pandemic-fighting, immunity-boosting, full of life, which, before the coronavirus claimed him, was lived fully by Henry Grimes. Grimes was one of the most revered bassists in jazz, who’d dropped off in the ’60s and by the ’80s was widely reported dead but resurfaced in 2002 when a social worker tracked him down in a single-room-occupancy LA hotel. He hadn’t played in three decades. But he moved to New York in 2003, returning to musical form. In a world he had never left, a recording that remains, here with Sonny Rollins.

Take four. Look up! We interrupt this session to bring you a giant asteroid passing overhead today, the biggest this year. You need a telescope for it, but go here for the next best way to see it. It’s a mile wide and twice as long. Thanks to my colleague Ben Dreyfuss, a former NASA astrophysicist, for the tip.

Take five. Before the New Orleans saint of music education Ellis Marsalis died this month of you-know-what, he raised a family of jazz trailblazers, including trumpeter Wynton and saxophonist Branford, who said Ellis “poured everything he had into making us the best of what we could be.” The mayor of New Orleans called Ellis “a legend…Words aren’t sufficient to describe the art, the joy & the wonder he showed the world.”

Take six. Alto saxophonist Lee Konitz lit up Miles Davis’ early bands and lived to see the coronavirus (but didn’t survive it), and in his vibrant 92 years, swung hard. Konitz had a roundly melodic style, bending notes and curving harmonic tones, taking wide lyrical turns in improvisations. He was born to Russian and Austrian parents in Chicago, and lives in his music.

Pulling together. Communities of Asian Americans and Asians across backgrounds have found creative ways to respond to the rise of xenophobic rhetoric and targeting in the wake of the outbreak, including a digital town hall tomorrow on how “Asian American history can help us understand the experience of AAPIs during this pandemic.” Big-name participants include novelist Viet Thanh Nguyen, comedian Hari Kondabolu, PBS NewsHour’s Amna Nawaz, California Rep. Judy Chu, and many others. Details here.

Book it. Little Free Libraries, the front-yard bookshelves, just won a major award for its contributions to global education. While the future of physical book-sharing is unknown, the libraries’ impact is growing: 100,000 registered Little Free Libraries in 100 countries. The movement started with one person. Thanks to Dave Beard, my Recharge predecessor and National Geographic’s exec newsletter editor, for this book tip.

I’ll leave you with this view from the National Park Service. Let me know about Duke’s recording and Aaron Diehl’s, at recharge@motherjones.com.

More Mother Jones reporting on Recharge

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate