Neil Young’s Lawsuit Against Trump Is As Weird and Iconoclastic as He Is

My my hey hey quadrennial intellectual property fights are here to stay.

Frazer Harrison/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Earlier this week, on August 4, the Hollywood Reporter was the first major media outlet to report the news that Neil Young is suing Donald Trump for playing his songs at campaign rallies. It has become a major news story since then. When I checked this morning, it was still trending. But the story was first hinted at by a smaller paper, The Neil Young Times-Contrarian.

The NYA Times-Contrarian does not have a regular publishing schedule, style guide, or clear purpose. It’s a fake newspaper (kind of?) on neilyoungarchives.com (a vast archival project that includes Young’s music, extensive notes on each song/album, and primary documents from his career). Young mostly uses it like a blog. On July 27, the Contrarian had a new “message” from Neil: “I am changing my mind about suing President Trump.” On Wednesday, the suit was filed and the complaint posted as an upload on the site.

The details of this lawsuit are less fun than you’d hope. Whether musicians can stop campaigns from publicly playing their music is a potentially interesting question on its face, but researching it leads to dull answers. It’s basically about inane legal issues involving licensing and copyright that have not been fully tested in the courts (because artists would rather signal public disdain with cease and desist letters than waste money actually suing politicians).

The gist is that the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers owns the distribution rights to Young’s music. The distributor has a political opt-out clause in which an artist can say they would not like certain songs played at political gatherings. ASCAP told Rolling Stone Young has used that opt-out clause to say his music cannot be used at Trump’s events. But Trump is still using the songs “Rockin’ In The Free World” and “Devil’s Sidewalk” at his rallies. But litigating that, though, will take time. There could be questions about if venues (instead of the campaign) has a similar contract. By the time it’s decided, the election could be over.

Like much of Young’s late-career work, there is an arch politics here that is both endearing and a bit corny. It is in line with the work of an artist who has released a 10-plus minute song about nature (“She Showed Me Love“), an entire album about Monsanto (and a film!), an almost 10-minute song about nature (“Be The Rain,” on Greendale, a narrative album about a climate activist), and just put out “Lookin’ for a Leader” about Trump. So, yeah, it’s probably a bit over the top.

But, more importantly, it’s a massive middle finger to anyone Neil Young doesn’t like.

This is the guy who, after becoming the biggest rock star in the world with his record Harvest (#1 on the Billboard charts, the smash hit “Heart of Gold”) famously “headed for the ditch.” He released a trilogy of albums that were incredibly dark and unpalatable to mainstream audiences. One was recorded with Cajun legend Rusty Kershaw, who gave the band drugs so potent that they all needed B12 shots to pep up; one was just live recordings of new songs Young never bothered to go into the studio to record; another was about his guitarist’s drug overdose on the day Young fired him from his backing band. Neil Young is going to do whatever he wants, his way. And, as an ardent fan, I just am here for the ride.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate