Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A cool thing about researching something is how learning new facts can change your mind.

Hi. I’m Brian, and I lead the online membership work at Mother Jones, finding ways to connect with you all and asking you to support our journalism from time to time.

Like right now, for Giving Tuesday, and I hope you’ll consider pitching in to help make our nonprofit reporting possible. But I have to admit, Giving Tuesday has always felt a bit weird to me.

I’m not sure exactly how I became an online fundraiser. It’s not like I decided to in college or after getting a masterpiece in my inbox, like Barack Obama’s legendary “hey” email. But I did, and I’ve been doing online work for nonprofits since way before Giving Tuesday was a thing, before Twitter blew up at SXSW, and before Facebook opened up outside of college campuses.

Oh look, I thought, another shiny object, probably meant for PR and big funders or corporate sponsors to latch onto, and that isn’t going to drive results in a big way. Every fundraiser knows that December is the most important month for online giving; that the lion’s share of donations come in during the final 10 days of the year; and that December 31st is the biggest day for online fundraising. It’s my field’s Super Bowl Sunday, and who does this Tuesday after Thanksgiving even think it is barging in like it owns the place? 

I was a lot like this guy, who poo-pooed Giving Tuesday’s debut, and questioned its theory of change the next year. I was also wrong! 

In 2018, after MoJo Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery spent Thanksgiving home alone with a nasty flu, watching people fight over flatscreens in the news, she started tweeting out DonorsChoose campaigns and raised $130,000 for public school teachers to meet their students’ needs across the country—they funded tables, washing machines, and drum kits. A few days later, on Giving Tuesday, she went on an epic 31-message twitter thread asking for donations to Mother Jones and holy sh*t people responded. I was getting lunch at a deli known for its fresh sourdough when I started seeing the donations pour in, and I remember that day every time I go back. 

You can’t fight with results like Clara’s. And last week, I looked into Giving Tuesday’s genesis a bit more, and it’s a pretty great story.

“The first Giving Tuesday started in 2012 to fight against Thanksgiving’s commercial corruption,” according to Fast Company‘s conversation with the day’s founder, Asha Curran, who was then with the 92nd Street Y in New York City. Sign me up for that! “The very basic premise of it was,” Curran asks, “could we turn people’s attention from two days of consuming to a day of giving?” That, it turns out, is exactly what Clara had done.  

Curran intentionally didn’t brand Giving Tuesday as coming from the 92nd Street Y, as Vox writes in this great explainer, and made advice and resources available to any nonprofit that wanted in on the initiative. That was egoless and smart, and really helped smaller nonprofits that don’t have fundraisers in house or the ability to be seen by a critical mass of donors on their own. The day has spread globally to countries that don’t even do the whole Black Friday–Cyber Monday thing.

One of the great things about working for Mother Jones is that there’s almost always something we’ve written on a topic at hand, and this feature from 2006 on how to avoid environmental catastrophe uses a study from the Max Planck Institute to show that, “clearly, we are inclined to behave as better citizens when we are educated and when our actions are visible.” Something, everything, about 2020 has me appreciating collective action like that right now.

I love seeing results, too. Last year, in its eighth iteration, Giving Tuesday raised nearly $2 billion worldwide! That’s a fraction of the total—Americans alone gave $450 billion in 2019—in philanthropy, so Giving Tuesday is not a true gamechanger, but in my book, anything that boosts generosity and makes it visible (let’s not talk about why so many social services are forced to rely on charity today) is worth getting on board with.  

The second half of December and the 31st itself will always have my fundraising heart (palpitations and all), but Giving Tuesday is pretty all right too—and I’d be delighted if you celebrated it with me by supporting Mother Jones with a Giving Tuesday donation today.    

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate