The Brands Trying to Win Gen Z Twitter Have Gone Too Far

Enough already.

Rafael Henrique / SOPA Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Attempts by businesses to appeal to Gen Z are getting really weird. On October 12, a Twitter user innocently tweeted about singer Katy Perry’s appearance at 2010 Kid’s Choice Awards, where the singer got absolutely blasted by a slime cannon hidden in a box.

For whatever reason, the Twitter account of Duolingo, a public company, chimed in, suggesting that the chartreuse liquid in question was perhaps its owl mascot’s ejaculate. Ew. Gross. I hate it! And while this is the first time I’ve seen a brand joke about ejaculating on a popstar’s face, it isn’t the first time I’ve seen corporations attempt edgy humor to try and appeal to a younger demographic. 

If there’s one thing that defines members of Gen Z, besides middle parts and social media savvy, it’s their unique sense of humor. As dark as it is silly, it is often compared with the sentiment of the absurdist Dada movement that emerged in response to the horrors of World War I. Many brands have adjusted their marketing strategies appropriately—or inappropriately—adopting an edgier online voice to appeal to young adults.  

One of the first to do this successfully on Twitter was everyone’s favorite pigtailed fast food mascot. Wendy’s snarky Twitter banter with followers was huge, even spawning Wendy’s fan art and fan fiction

Now every corporate social media account has its own persona. Cinnabon Twitter posts about Taylor Swift’s album drops, and is apparently dating Slim Jim Twitter.

Steak Umms Twitter toggles between sharing insightful ruminations on the perils of capitalism and tweeting random nonsense like “pumpkin spice beef sheets.”  And let’s not even talk about the horny disaster that is the Wingstop Twitter. 

But in the Digital Age, it’s not enough to just be edgy: You’re also aiming to go viral. At this point, brands are racing to see who can tweet or otherwise relay the wildest statements known to humankind, with little regard for what is okay. To joke publicly about jizzing on a woman’s face is inappropriate and sexist under most any circumstances, but the fact that Duolingo is an educational language app makes it so much worse. 

This isn’t the first time Duolingo’s social media team has done something tactless. During the widely covered Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation trial, Duolingo Twitter made a quip at Heard’s expense. In May, NBC News had uploaded to TikTok a trial clip in which Heard talks about the barrage of online hate she’d been receiving. Of this, Duolingo tweeted: “Y’all think amber watches tiktok”—and was quickly called out for making light of a case involving allegations of physical abuse and sexual assault. (Duolingo’s 24-year-old social media manager apologized.)

But even when these marketing tweets are more grounded, they still are weird. Yes, Starbucks tweeting about how it’s  planning to sleep on a flight only to immediately buy coffee at the airport is relatable and harmless. But when paired with the company’s recent union busting efforts, it’s not so cute anymore. 

I, for one, am sick of corporate attempts at cleverness cluttering my social media timeline. There’s something insanely off-putting about a faceless company trying to sound like a real person. Are some of the tweets funny? Sure. But it would be wise to remember that these brands are not your friends.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate