Friends of Angelo are No Friends of Issa

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


If things get a bit uncomfortable for members of Congress and Obama administration officials, they’ll have Darrell Issa to blame for that. Since news broke last June that federal lawmakers and other VIPs had received sweetheart loans through what Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo dubbed his “Friends of Angelo” program, the California Republican and ranking member of the House oversight committee has been leading the charge to investigate the matter. He says his investigation has “uncovered evidence that only a fraction of those who participated in Countrywide’s VIP program have come to light,” and Issa has every intention of flipping on the floodlights of accountability.

But there’s a hitch. While Bank of America, which acquired Countrywide in 2008, has agreed to provide Issa with documents that he’s requested, it will only do so under subpoena. Obtaining that subpoena will require a full committee vote and the cooperation of oversight committee chariman Edolphus Towns, who has been seemingly reluctant to open this can of worms. In fact, Towns declined to sign his name to the letter [PDF] Issa sent to BofA CEO Ken Lewis in early June requesting the “Friends of Angelo”-related documents. Why? According to the Wall Street Journal:

A spokeswoman for Mr. Towns said the Friends of Angelo program wasn’t on the chairman’s priority list, which includes oversight of the nation’s financial crisis, the financial bailout of banks and the giant federal financial stimulus package.

This explanation seems a little feeble. If Countrywide used below market rate loans to influence politicians to turn the other way while it helped to ransack the US economy, that seems directly relevant to the financial crisis—and certainly worthy of Towns’ to-investigate list. Of course, it’s easy to see why Issa’s mission to uncover “the extent that special benefits co-opted public servants who were supposed to be watchdogs of the mortgage industry” might make lawmakers squeamish. If there are indeed many as yet unnamed “friends of Angelo” out there, they all have a keen interest in making sure it stays that way. Several prominent Democrats have already been named as VIP loan recipients, including Senators Kent Conrad and Chris Dodd, who are presently under investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee. President Obama’s envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, was also on the list. Issa says the VIP loan program “is a bipartisan problem” and tells the Journal that it’s clear that influential Republicans took part in it too. (George W. Bush’s HUD secretary Alphonso Jackson was apparently one of them.)

While Towns may fear that Issa’s probe is merely a ploy to drop the hammer on as many Dems as he can, it may be difficult, in the end, for the oversight chairman to withhold his support for a subpoena. Issa’s making sure of that. “I have engaged in constructive conversations with Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Edolphus Towns about issuing the subpoena that Bank of America has indicated it needs to fully cooperate with our investigation,” Issa said today in a release. If those conversations start to get less constructive, you can bet Issa is going to let us know about it.
 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate